Bradford Technologies, Inc. v. NCV Software.com et al
Filing
39
STIPULATION AND ORDER re #36 Stipulation for Extension of Time to Reply, filed by Karma Technologies, LLC. Responses due by 11/30/2011.. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D Laporte on 11/22/2011. (kns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/23/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
Kurt A. Kappes, CA Bar No. 146384
kappesk@gtlaw.com
Matthew L. Reagan, CA Bar No. 261832
reaganma@gtlaw.com
1201 K Street, Suite 1100
Sacramento, California 95814
Telephone: (916) 442-1111
Facsimile: (916) 448-1709
ANDERSON & KARRENBERG
Thomas R. Karrenberg (admitted pro hac vice)
tkarrenberg@aklawfirm.com
Heather M. Sneddon (admitted pro hac vice)
hsneddon@aklawfirm.com
Samantha J. Slark (admitted pro hac vice)
sslark@aklawfirm.com
50 West Broadway, Suite 700
Salt Lake City, Utah 84101
Telephone: (801) 534-1700
Facsimile: (801) 364-7697
Attorneys for Defendant
KARMA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
BRADFORD TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
NCV SOFTWARE.com, an entity of unknown )
form; METRO NATIONAL FINANCIAL,
)
LLC, a Utah limited liability company,
)
KARMA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, a Utah
)
limited liability company, JOHN DAVID
)
BIGGERS, an individual, RODNEY
)
NEWMAN, an individual, RICHARD PETER )
STEVES, an individual, RICHARD FRANK, )
an individual, and DOES 1-50,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
Case No. 3:11-CV-04621 (EDL)
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME FOR KARMA
TECHNOLOGIES, LLC TO FILE A
REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION
TO DISMISS OR, IN THE
ALTERNATIVE, FOR MORE
DEFINITE STATEMENT
Date: December 13, 2011
Time: 2:00 p.m.
Dept./Place: Courtroom E – 15th Floor
Judge: Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte
Defendant Karma Technologies, LLC (“Karma”), by and through its undersigned
counsel, hereby requests an extension of time to file a reply memorandum in support of its
Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for More Definite Statement (the “Motion to Dismiss”).
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME FOR KARMA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC TO FILE
A REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO DISMISS OR, IN THE
ALTERNATIVE, FOR MORE DEFNIITE STATEMENT
Case No. 3:11-CV-04621-EDL
Page 1
1
The reply is currently due on Wednesday, November 23, 2011 (the day before Thanksgiving),
2
and Karma requests an extension until November 30, 2011.
3
As set forth in the Declaration of Heather M. Sneddon, filed concurrently herewith,
4
Karma requests the foregoing extension in light of the Thanksgiving holiday and the previously-
5
scheduled family vacations of its attorneys. Karma has not previously requested an extension of
6
time by stipulation or through Court order. In addition, because the hearing on Karma’s Motion
7
to Dismiss is not scheduled until December 13, 2011, the filing of Karma’s reply memorandum
8
by November 30, 2011 should not affect the schedule in this case. Finally, Plaintiff Bradford
9
Technologies, LLC, through its undersigned counsel, stipulates to Karma’s requested extension.
10
11
Accordingly, Karma respectfully requests that it be granted an extension until November
30, 2011 to file a reply memorandum in support of its Motion to Dismiss.
12
13
Respectfully submitted,
DATED: November 22, 2011
GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
14
By: /s/ Matthew L. Reagan
15
16
- and -
17
ANDERSON & KARRENBERG
Thomas R. Karrenberg
Heather M. Sneddon
Samantha J. Slark
18
19
Attorneys for Defendant
KARMA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
20
21
Stipulated:
22
23
DATED: November 22, 2011
THE HERITAGE LAW GROUP, P.C.
24
By: /s/ Roger D. Wintle
25
Attorneys for Plaintiff
BRADFORD TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME FOR KARMA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC TO FILE
A REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO DISMISS OR, IN THE
ALTERNATIVE, FOR MORE DEFNIITE STATEMENT
Case No. 3:11-CV-04621-EDL
Page 2
ORDER
1
2
3
4
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
DATED: November ______, 2011
BY THE COURT:
5
6
The Honorable Elizabeth D. Laporte
7
U.S. District Court Magistrate Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME FOR KARMA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC TO FILE
A REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO DISMISS OR, IN THE
ALTERNATIVE, FOR MORE DEFNIITE STATEMENT
Case No. 3:11-CV-04621-EDL
Page 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?