Bradford Technologies, Inc. v. NCV Software.com et al
Filing
57
ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE: Reset Deadlines as to #43 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction- Responses due by 7/25/2012. Replies due by 8/1/2012, #15 MOTION to Dismiss OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT, #10 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Motion Hearing for all 3 motions is set for 8/21/2012 02:00 PM in Courtroom E, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. Case Management Statement due by 8/14/2012. Further Case Management Conference set for 8/21/2012 02:00 PM in Courtroom E, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 7/11/2012. (kns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/12/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
BRADFORD TECHNOLOGIES, INC,
Plaintiff,
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
No. C 11-04621 EDL
ORDER CONTINUING CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE;
SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
v.
NCV SOFTWARE.COM, et al.,
Defendants.
/
13
14
This case is set for an initial case management conference on July 17, 2012 at 9:00 a.m.
15
However, there are three pending motions to dismiss that should be resolved prior to the case
16
management conference. See Dkt. # 10, 15, 43. Two of the motions to dismiss were fully briefed
17
before the stay of this case, but an opposition and reply to Defendant Newman’s motion to dismiss
18
were not filed prior to the stay. Plaintiff shall file a response to Defendant Newman’s motion to
19
dismiss by July 25 and Defendant Newman shall file a reply, if any, by August 1. A hearing on the
20
three motions to dismiss will be held on August 21, 2012 at 2:00 p.m. A case management
21
conference will be conducted immediately after the hearing on the motions to dismiss.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 11, 2012
ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?