Martinez v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A. et al

Filing 25

ORDER VACATING HEARING. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 2/14/2012. (sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/14/2012)

1
2
3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6

RAFAEL A. MARTINEZ,

7
Plaintiff,

8

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

9

v.

10

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al.

11

Defendants.

12
13

) Case No. 11-4624 SC
)
) ORDER VACATING HEARING
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

On February 1, 2012, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause

14

why this matter should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute

15

after Plaintiff failed to respond to Defendant's motion to dismiss.

16

ECF No. 19.

17

10:00 A.M. to address Plaintiff's failure to respond.

18

Plaintiff's counsel subsequently filed a declaration explaining the

19

situation, ECF No. 22, and the Court granted Plaintiff leave to

20

file an opposition, ECF No. 23.

21

Plaintiff's response to its order to show cause, the hearing set

22

for February 24, 2012 is hereby VACATED.

The Court also set a hearing for February 24, 2012 at
Id.

As the Court is satisfied with

23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25
26
27
28

Dated:

February 14, 2012
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE