Ocampo et al v. U.S. Bancorp et al

Filing 17

ORDER Dismissing Case for Failure to Prosecute. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 10/28/2011. (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11

CESARIO OCAMPO,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

No. C 11-04646 CRB
ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR
FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND
COMPLY WITH ORDER TO SHOW
CAUSE

v.
US BANCORP, et al.,
Defendants.

/

16
17

Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint on September 26, 2011.

18

Dkt. 11. Per Local Rule 7-3(a) Plaintiff’s Response was due by Monday, October 11, 2011.

19

No Response was filed. On October 14, 2011, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause by

20

Friday, October 21, 2011 why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute

21

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), along with any other materials he wished

22

the Court to consider in opposition to the Motion to Dismiss. Dkt. 15. As of this date,

23

Plaintiff has not filed any Response, either to the Order to Show Cause or the Motion to

24

Dismiss. Therefore, this case is hereby DISMISSED for failure to prosecute pursuant to

25

Federal Rule 41(b).

26
27

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 28, 2011
CHARLES R. BREYER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

28

G:\CRBALL\2011\4646\Order Dismissing for Failure to Prosecute.wpd