Hubbard et al v. Wenner Media LLC

Filing 66

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 65 TO RESET DATES OF INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND ARGUMENT ON MOTION filed by Jasmine Hubbard, Marvel Mills Case Management Statement due by 1/10/2013. Case Management Conference set for 1/17/2013 01:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Motion Hearing set for 1/17/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Edward M. Chen.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/22/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2012)

Download PDF
Sean Reis (SBN 184004) 1 sreis@edelson.com Edelson McGuire, LLP 2 30021 Tomas Street, Suite 300 Rancho Santa Margarita, California 92688 3 Telephone: (949) 459-2124 4 Facsimile: (949) 459-2123 Ryan D. Andrews (admitted pro hac vice) 5 Edelson McGuire, LLC 350 North LaSalle Street, 13th Fl. 6 Chicago, Illinois 60654 Telephone: (312) 589-6370 7 Facsimile: (312) 589-26378 randrews@edelson.com 8 9 Counsel for Plaintiffs 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 JASMINE HUBBARD AND MARVEL 13 MILLS, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals, 14 Plaintiffs, 15 vs. 16 17 WENNER MEDIA LLC, a Delaware limited liability company 18 Defendant. 19 20 Case No. 3:11-cv-04648-EMC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESET DATES OF INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND ARGUMENT ON MOTION Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b) and 6-2 of the United States District Court for the 21 Northern District of California and Rule 4 of Civil Standing Order – General of the Honorable 22 Edward M. Chen, it is hereby stipulated by and among Plaintiffs Jasmine Hubbard and Marvel 23 Mills and Defendant Wenner Media LLC (collectively the “Parties”), by and through their 24 respective counsel of record, as follows: 25 1. Plaintiffs filed the Complaint in this case on September 20, 2011. On December 9, 26 2011, Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, to Transfer to the Southern 27 District of New York (“Defendant’s Motion”). Defendant’s Motion has been fully briefed and 28 oral argument was originally scheduled for February 17, 2012. 1 STIPULATION Case No. CV-11-04648 EMC 1 2. The Parties wished to engage in settlement discussions, indicated a desire to 2 schedule an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge, and had an ADR phone 3 conference on February 14, 2012. In addition, the Parties had reason to believe that discovery 4 from third-parties would maximize the Parties ability to engage in meaningful settlement 5 discussions. 6 3. In consideration of this, the Parties stipulated to a Stay of sixty (60) days, which 7 this Court signed on February 13, 2012. (Dkt. 49.) During the stipulated period, the Parties 8 requested that this Court issue no decision on Defendant’s Motion. 9 4. The Parties again stipulated to move the hearing date on Defendant’s Motion from 10 April 20, 2012 to August 17, 2012. (Dkt. 57.) 11 5. Due to delays in the discovery process, the Parties stipulated to move the settlement 12 conference date, as well as the hearing date on Defendant’s Motion that was scheduled for August 13 17, 2012. (Dkt. 63.) 14 6. On August 7, 2012, the Court entered an Order setting the hearing date on 15 Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, as well as the Case Management Conference, for November 2, 16 2012. (Dkt. 64.) 17 7. Since the entry of that Order, the Parties have received additional third-party 18 discovery and have begun discussing an alternative settlement model. 19 8. The Parties believe that they will be able to determine in the next few weeks if the 20 settlement of this matter pursuant to the terms currently under discussion can be effectuated and 21 that it would be in the best interests of judicial economy and efficiency to continue the hearing on 22 Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and the Case Management Conference. 23 9. This Stipulation will be the last request for a continuance of hearing on Defendant’s 24 Motion and the Case Management Conference. 25 10. This stipulation would alter certain preliminary deadlines established by this Court, 26 including the obligation to file a Joint Case Management Statement in advance of the Case 27 Management Conference currently scheduled for November 2, 2012 at 1:30 p.m. 28 2 STIPULATION Case No. C 11-4648-EMC 1 a. The Initial Case Management Conference scheduled for Friday, November 2 2, 2012 shall be continued to Friday, January 11, 2013 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, 3 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California, or as soon thereafter as is convenient for the 4 Court. 5 b. Oral argument on Defendant’s Motion shall be continued to the same date 6 and time as the Initial Case Management Conference, or as soon thereafter as is convenient for the 7 Court. 8 c. The October 26, 2012 deadline for the Parties to file a Joint Case 9 Management Statement shall be continued to January 4, 2013. 10 This is the fifth stipulated time modification in this case; on November 7, 2011, the Parties 11 filed a joint stipulation to extend the time for Defendant to answer, move or otherwise respond to 12 the Complaint, and the Court so ordered on November 9, 2011. On February 10, 2012, the Parties 13 filed a stipulation and proposed order to reset the Case Management Conference and oral 14 argument on Defendant’s Motion, which the Court so ordered on February 13, 2012. On April 9, 15 2012, the Parties filed a stipulation and proposed order to reset the Case Management Conference 16 and oral argument on Defendant’s Motion, which the Court so ordered on April 10, 2012. On 17 August 3, 2012, the Parties filed a stipulation and proposed order to reset the Case Management 18 Conference and oral argument on Defendant’s Motion, which the Court so ordered, with 19 modification, on August 7, 2012, resetting the date for November 2, 2012. No trial date has been 20 // 21 // 22 // 23 // 24 // 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 3 STIPULATION Case No. C 11-4648-EMC 1 set, so this extension will not require that a trial date be rescheduled, but it will require that the 2 Initial Case Management Conference and related deadlines be rescheduled, as set forth supra. 3 4 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 5 6 DATED this 19th day of October 2012. 7 EDELSON MCGUIRE LLP DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 8 9 10 11 12 By:_/s/ Thomas R. Burke______ By:__/s/ Sean Reis_______________ Sean Reis 30021 Tomas Street, Suite 300 Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688 Phone: (949) 459-2124 Attorneys for Jasmine Hubbard and Marvel Mills Thomas R. Burke 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, CA 94111-6533 Phone: (415) 276-6500 Attorneys for Wenner Media LLC 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 STIPULATION Case No. C 11-4648-EMC 1 2 CERTIFICATION I, Sean Reis, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file 3 this Joint Case Management Statement and Request to Continue. In compliance with Civil Local 4 Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that Sharon Schneier has concurred in this filing. 5 Dated: October 19, 2012 6 EDELSON MCGUIRE LLC 7 8 By /s/ Sean Reis SEAN REIS Attorneys for Plaintiffs Jasmine Hubbard and Marvel Mills 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5 STIPULATION Case No. C 11-4648-EMC 1 ORDER 2 S DISTRICT TE C TA __________________________________________ RT U O THE HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN UNITED STATES ERED RD DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 9 10 11 OO IT IS S DIFIED AS MO NO 12 RT ER H 13 dward Judge E 14 N n F D IS T IC T O R 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 6 STIPULATION Case No. C 11-4648-EMC M. Che R NIA 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 DATED: October ___, 2012 Defendant's motion to dismiss is reset for January17, 2013 at 1:30 p.m. FO 7 Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California. LI 6 A 5 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the November 2, 2012 Initial Case Management Thursday, January 17, 2013 Conference shall be rescheduled to Friday, January 11, 2013, at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 5, 17th S 4 Pursuant to stipulation, the foregoing is approved and IT IS SO ORDERED. UNIT ED 3 C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?