Ziehm v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Comany

Filing 27

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 26 For Dismissal With Prejudice filed by Metropolitan Life Insurance Comany. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/26/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/26/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 SEDGWICK LLP REBECCA A. HULL Bar No. 99802 rebecca.hull@sedgwicklaw.com MARK J. HANCOCK Bar No. 160662 mark.hancock@sedgwicklaw.com 333 Bush Street, 30th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 781-7900 Facsimile: (415) 781-2635 Attorneys for Defendant METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ATHENA ZIEHM, CASE NO. C 11-04659 EMC 11 Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 12 vs. 13 14 15 METROPOLITAN COMPANY, LIFE INSURANCE Defendant. 16 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between all parties to this action that the above17 18 captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the 19 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and that each party shall bear her or its own costs and 20 attorneys’ fees. 21 22 IT IS SO AGREED AND STIPULATED. DATED: June 22, 2012 WILLIAM A. RESNECK, ATTORNEY AT LAW 23 24 25 26 27 By: William A. Resneck William A. Resneck Attorneys for Plaintiff Athena Ziehm 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 1 1 DATED: June 22, 2012 SEDGWICK LLP 2 3 By: Rebecca A. Hull Rebecca A. Hull Mark J. Hancock Attorneys for Defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company 4 5 6 7 8 ORDER 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. S R NIA FO ER H 16 RT 15 NO 14 D _____________________________________ RDERE IS SO O I M. Hon. EdwardT Chen UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE en d M. Ch e Edwar Judg LI 13 DATED: 6/26/12 17 A 12 RT U O 11 S DISTRICT TE C TA UNIT ED 10 N F D IS T IC T O R C 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?