Ziehm v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Comany
Filing
27
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 26 For Dismissal With Prejudice filed by Metropolitan Life Insurance Comany. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/26/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/26/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
SEDGWICK LLP
REBECCA A. HULL Bar No. 99802
rebecca.hull@sedgwicklaw.com
MARK J. HANCOCK Bar No. 160662
mark.hancock@sedgwicklaw.com
333 Bush Street, 30th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 781-7900
Facsimile: (415) 781-2635
Attorneys for Defendant
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
ATHENA ZIEHM,
CASE NO. C 11-04659 EMC
11
Plaintiff,
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
12
vs.
13
14
15
METROPOLITAN
COMPANY,
LIFE
INSURANCE
Defendant.
16
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between all parties to this action that the above17
18
captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the
19
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and that each party shall bear her or its own costs and
20
attorneys’ fees.
21
22
IT IS SO AGREED AND STIPULATED.
DATED: June 22, 2012
WILLIAM A. RESNECK, ATTORNEY AT LAW
23
24
25
26
27
By:
William A. Resneck
William A. Resneck
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Athena Ziehm
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
1
1
DATED: June 22, 2012
SEDGWICK LLP
2
3
By: Rebecca A. Hull
Rebecca A. Hull
Mark J. Hancock
Attorneys for Defendant
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
4
5
6
7
8
ORDER
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
S
R NIA
FO
ER
H
16
RT
15
NO
14
D
_____________________________________
RDERE
IS SO O
I M.
Hon. EdwardT Chen
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
en
d M. Ch
e Edwar
Judg
LI
13
DATED: 6/26/12
17
A
12
RT
U
O
11
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
UNIT
ED
10
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?