Krushwitz v. University of California at Berkeley

Filing 42

ORDER Re: Filing Error and Amended Answer (lblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 Northern District of California 10 San Francisco Division KAREN KRUSHWITZ, 12 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 No. C 11-04676 LB Plaintiff, v. ORDER 13 14 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEY, 15 Defendant. _____________________________________/ 16 Due to a clerk’s office error, the copy of Plaintiff’s Complaint that is posted on the court’s 17 Electronic Case File is missing four pages of the Complaint hard-filed with this court and served on 18 the Defendant. If Defendant’s Answer does not address all of the Complaint’s allegations, 19 Defendant should file an Amended Answer as soon as possible. The court will e-file the correct 20 Complaint. In light of the pending hearing on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment 21 scheduled for July 5, 2012, Defendant shall inform the court by Tuesday, July 3, 2012 at 12:00 p.m. 22 if it needs to file an Amended Answer and when it will be filed. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 Dated: July 2, 2012 _______________________________ LAUREL BEELER United States Magistrate Judge 25 26 27 28 C 11-04676 LB ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?