Krushwitz v. University of California at Berkeley
Filing
42
ORDER Re: Filing Error and Amended Answer (lblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
Northern District of California
10
San Francisco Division
KAREN KRUSHWITZ,
12
For the Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
No. C 11-04676 LB
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
13
14
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT
BERKELEY,
15
Defendant.
_____________________________________/
16
Due to a clerk’s office error, the copy of Plaintiff’s Complaint that is posted on the court’s
17
Electronic Case File is missing four pages of the Complaint hard-filed with this court and served on
18
the Defendant. If Defendant’s Answer does not address all of the Complaint’s allegations,
19
Defendant should file an Amended Answer as soon as possible. The court will e-file the correct
20
Complaint. In light of the pending hearing on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment
21
scheduled for July 5, 2012, Defendant shall inform the court by Tuesday, July 3, 2012 at 12:00 p.m.
22
if it needs to file an Amended Answer and when it will be filed.
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
Dated: July 2, 2012
_______________________________
LAUREL BEELER
United States Magistrate Judge
25
26
27
28
C 11-04676 LB
ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?