PNY Technologies, Inc. v. Sandisk Corporation

Filing 26

ORDER continuing motion (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

John L. Cooper (SBN 50324)
[e-mail]
Roderick M. Thompson (SBN 96192)
[e-mail]
Jessica K. Nall (SBN 215149)
[e-mail]
Allyson M. Franco (SBN 273467)
[e-mail]
FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP
235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Ira Gottlieb (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Scott Christie (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Jonathan Short (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Richard Hernandez (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Mark Anania (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
McCARTER & ENGLISH, LLP
Four Gateway Center, 100 Mulberry Street
Newark, New Jersey 07102
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
PNY TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Allen J. Ruby (SBN 47109)
David W. Hansen (SBN 196958)
SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER &
FLOM LLP
525 University Avenue, Suite 1100
Palo Alto, California 94301
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
James A. Keyte (pro hac vice application
forthcoming)
SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER &
FLOM LLP
Four Times Square
New York, NY 10036
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
Richard S. Taffet (pro hac vice application
forthcoming)
BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP
399 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10022
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
SANDISK CORPORATION

17
18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

19

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

20

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

21

PNY TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

22

Plaintiff,

23

vs.

24

SANDISK CORPORATION,

25

Defendant.

Case No. 3:11-cv-04689 (SI)
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SETTING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE
ON SANDISK CORPORATION’S
MOTION TO DISMISS
Dept: Courtroom 10, 19th Fl.
Judge: Honorable Susan Illston

26
Complaint Filed: September 21, 2011
27
28
Farella Braun + Martel LLP
235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
[phone]

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order /
Case No. 3:11-cv-04689 (SI)
6749283.7

27083\2854934.2

1

WHEREAS, on November 9, 2011, Defendant SanDisk Corporation (“SanDisk”) filed a

2

Motion to Dismiss (“Motion”), setting the hearing on SanDisk’s Motion for December 16, 2011;

3

WHEREAS, counsel for Plaintiff PNY Technologies, Inc. (“PNY”) asked counsel for

4

SanDisk to agree to an extension of the briefing and hearing schedule on the Motion, pursuant to

5

which PNY’s Opposition to the Motion would be due on December 7, 2011, and SanDisk having

6

requested its reply be due December 21, 2011, and PNY therefore having asked that the hearing

7

on the Motion be scheduled for January 6, 2012;

8

WHEREAS, SanDisk does not object to PNY’s requested extension;

9

WHEREAS, the Court set the Initial Case Management Conference in this action for

10

January 6, 2012, at 2:30 p.m.; and

11

WHEREAS, counsel for the Parties have met and conferred, and have agreed to propose

12

an alternative briefing schedule for SanDisk’s Motion, as well as an alternative date for hearing

13

SanDisk’s Motion on the same date as the Initial Case Management Conference;

14

THEREFORE, pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, the Parties request that the

15

Court reset the briefing schedule for SanDisk’s Motion and the Hearing date for that Motion and

16

the Initial Case Management Conference on the same date as set forth below or on such other

17

dates as may be acceptable to the Court:

18

1.

PNY’s Opposition to SanDisk’s Motion will be due on December 7, 2011;

19

2.

SanDisk’s Reply in Support of its Motion will be due on December 21, 2011; and

20

3.

The Hearing on SanDisk’s Motion will be January 6, 2012, at 9:00 a.m.
Jan. 13

21
22

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

23
24

Dated: November 14, 2011

25

I represent that concurrence in the filing of
this document has been obtained from each
of the other signatories.

26

FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP

By: /s/ John L. Cooper
John L. Cooper

27
Attorneys for Plaintiff
PNY Technologies, Inc.

28
Farella Braun + Martel LLP
235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
[phone]

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order /
Case No. 3:11-cv-04689 (SI)
6749283.7

-227083\2854934.2

1

Dated: November 14, 2011

SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER &
FLOM LLP

2
3
By: /s/ Allen J. Ruby
Allen J. Ruby

4
5

Attorneys for Defendant
SanDisk Corporation

6
PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, AND GOOD CAUSE

7
8

APPEARING, IT IS SO ORDERED.

9
10
11

Dated:

11/15

, 2011
THE HONORABLE SUSAN ILLSTON

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Farella Braun + Martel LLP
235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
[phone]

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order /
Case No. 3:11-cv-04689 (SI)
6749283.7

-327083\2854934.2