Key v. Apple Inc. et al

Filing 14

STIPULATION AND ORDER to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/13/2011. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2011)

1 RAOUL D. KENNEDY (STATE BAR NO. 40892)
[e-mail]
2 RICHARD S. HORVATH, JR. (STATE BAR NO. 254681)
[e-mail]
3 SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP
525 University Avenue, Suite 1100
4 Palo Alto, California 94301
Telephone: [phone]
5 Facsimile: [phone]
6 PAUL M. ECKLES (STATE BAR NO. 181156)
[e-mail]
7 SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP
4 Times Square
8 New York, New York 10036
Telephone: [phone]
9 Facsimile: [phone]
10 Attorneys for Specially Appearing Defendant
HARPERCOLLINS PUBLISHERS L.L.C.
11
12
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

14 KATRINA KEY, Individually and on Behalf
of All Others Similarly Situated,
15
Plaintiff,
16
vs.
17 APPLE INC.; HACHETTE BOOK GROUP;
HARPERCOLLINS PUBLISHERS, INC.;
18
MACMILLAN PUBLISHERS, INC.;
19 PENGUIN GROUP (USA) INC.; and SIMON
& SCHUSTER, INC.,
20
Defendants.
21

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 3:11-cv-04754-EMC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND

CASE NO. 3:11-CV-04754-EMC

1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

2
3

WHEREAS, there have been multiple actions related to this case filed in both the

4 Northern District of California and the Southern District of New York (the “Actions”);
5

WHEREAS, the Court has entered an order in one of the related actions, Petru,, et

6 al. v. Apple, Inc., et al. (11-cv-3892 N.D. Cal.) (the "Petru Action"), to extend the time to answer,
7 move or otherwise respond to the complaint until December 15, 2011, without prejudice to the
8 right of any party to seek a further adjustment to the schedule;
9

WHEREAS, on October 5th, 2011, the Court entered an order relating the above

10 captioned action to the Petru Action and transferring this action to the Honorable Edward M. Chen;
11

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that the response date in this action should not

12 come prior to the response date in the Petru Action;
13

WHEREAS, Plaintiff agrees that submission of this Stipulation should be without

14 prejudice to any defense of Hachette Book Group, Inc., HarperCollins Publishers L.L.C.
15 (incorrectly sued as “HarperCollins Publishers, Inc.”), Holtzbrinck Publishers, LLC d/b/a
16 Macmillan (incorrectly sued as “Macmillan Publishers, Inc.”), Penguin Group (USA) Inc., Simon
17 & Schuster, Inc., and Apple, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”);
18

WHEREAS, there have been no other modifications to Defendants’ time to answer,

19 move or otherwise respond to the complaint in this action;
20

WHEREAS, this stipulation to extend the time within which Defendants have to

21 answer, move or otherwise respond to the complaint in this action will not alter the date of any
22 event or any deadline already fixed by Court order;
23

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and

24 between Plaintiff and Defendants, as follows:
25

1.

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1, 6-2, and 7-12 Defendants’ time to answer,

26 move or otherwise respond to the complaint is hereby extended to December 15, 2011, without
27 prejudice to the right of any party to seek a further adjustment to the response date based on future
28 developments;
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND

CASE NO. 3:11-CV-04754-EMC

1

2.

If any of the Defendants that is a party to this Stipulation responds to a

2 complaint in any of the Actions prior to the time provided in this Stipulation, Defendants will
3 respond to the complaint in this action at the same time;
4

3.

No defense of Defendants is prejudiced or waived by its submission of this

5 Stipulation; and
6

4.

Defense counsel may file notices of appearance in this action without

7 prejudice to their respective clients’ jurisdictional or venue defenses.
8 DATED: October 12, 2011
9

SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP

10
11
12
13
14

By:

/s/ Raoul D. Kennedy
RAOUL D. KENNEDY

525 University Ave., Suite 1100
Palo Alto, California 94301
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Specially Appearing Defendant
HARPERCOLLINS PUBLISHERS L.L.C.

15
16

I, Raoul D. Kennedy, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Extend Time To Respond To Complaint. In compliance with
17 General Order 45, X.B., I attest that each of the following signatories has concurred in this filing.
18

SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

By:

/s/ James Donato
JAMES DONATO

Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 3800
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Specially Appearing Defendant
HACHETTE BOOK GROUP, INC.

26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND

CASE NO. 3:11-CV-04754-EMC

1

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

2
3
4
5
6

By:

555 California Street
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

7

Attorneys for Specially Appearing Defendant
HOLTZBRINCK PUBLISHERS, LLC
D/B/A MACMILLAN

8
9

/s/ Samuel R. Miller
SAMUEL R. MILLER

AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP

10
11
12
13
14

By:

580 California Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, California 94104-1036
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

/s/ Reginald D. Steer
REGINALD D. STEER

Attorneys for Specially Appearing Defendant
PENGUIN GROUP (USA) INC.
WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP

By:

/s/ Gregory D. Hull
GREGORY D. HULL

201 Redwood Shores Parkway
Redwood Shores, California 94065
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Specially Appearing Defendant
SIMON & SCHUSTER, INC.

24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND

CASE NO. 3:11-CV-04754-EMC

1

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

2
3

By:

4

/s/ Daniel S. Floyd
DANIEL S. FLOYD

333 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

5
6
7

Attorneys for Specially Appearing Defendant
APPLE INC.

8

SCOTT+SCOTT LLP

9
10

By:

11
12

/s/ Walter W. Noss
WALTER W. NOSS

707 Broadway, Suite 1000
San Diego, CA 92101
Telephone: [phone]

13
14

By:

NO

H

ER

FO

RT

20

. Chen

dward M

Judge E

LI

19

21

R NIA

Hon. Edward M. Chen
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

22

A

18

10/13
Dated: _______________, 2011

ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T

RT
U
O

17

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
S

16

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNIT
ED

15

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

23
24
25
26
27
28
4
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND

CASE NO. 3:11-CV-04754-EMC