Larsen et al v. Nonni's Foods, LLC et al

Filing 18

STIPULATION AND ORDER Extending Defendants' Time to Respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint and Modifying Briefing Schedule. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/1/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Robert Boldt (SB# 180136) Email: robert.boldt@kirkland.com Beth Marie Weinstein (SB# 252334) Email: beth.weinstein@kirkland.com KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 333 S. Hope Street Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: (213) 680-8400 Facsimile: (213) 680-8500 Attorneys for Defendant Nonni’s Foods LLC 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 TAMAR DAVIS LARSEN AND KIMBERLY S. SETHAVANISH, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, 13 14 15 vs. NONNI’S FOODS LLC AND CHIPITA AMERICA, INC., Case No.: 11-CV-04758-SC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT AND TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE L.R. 6-1(a) and L.R. 7-12 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 WHEREAS, on September 23, 2011, Plaintiffs Tamar Davis Larsen and Kimberly S. Sethavanish (collectively, “Plaintiffs’) filed their “Complaint For Damages, Equitable, Declaratory And Injunctive Relief” in the above-captioned Court, alleging claims against defendants Nonni’s Foods, LLC and Chipita America, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”) for violations of California Business and Professions Code sections 17200 (Unfair Competition Law) and 17500 (False Advertising Law) and California Civil Code section 1750 (Consumer Legal Remedies Act), as well as claims for common law fraud and restitution; and WHEREAS, on November 15, 2011, the parties filed a Second Stipulation to Extend Defendants’ Time to Respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint, thereby granting Defendants an extension to 28 –1– US_ACTIVE-107491821.2 STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT – Case No. 11-CV-04758-SC 1 2 3 4 5 6 and including November 30, 2011 to respond to the Complaint; and WHEREAS, the parties now agree to an additional extension of time for Defendants to respond to the Complaint, through and including January 13, 2012; and WHEREAS, counsel for Nonni’s Foods LLC is in the process of substituting in as counsel of record for Chipita America, Inc.; and WHEREAS, the parties intend to participate in good faith settlement discussions, which may 7 obviate the need for the Court to decide matters relating to Defendants’ response to Plaintiffs’ 8 Complaint; and 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 WHEREAS, there is an Initial Status Conference in this matter currently set for January 13, 2012; and WHEREAS, this extension will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order; WHEREAS, in light of the foregoing, good causes exists to grant Defendants additional time to respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiffs and Defendants, through their respective attorneys of record, that: 1. Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, Defendants shall have an extension of time, to and including January 13, 2012, to file a response to Plaintiffs’ Complaint; 2. Defendants will notice any necessary hearing for its response to Plaintiffs’ Complaint no earlier than March 9, 2012; and 3. Pursuant to Local Rule 7-12, the following briefing schedule shall apply to Defendants’ response to Plaintiffs’ Complaint: a. Defendants’ responsive pleading to be due January 13, 2012 24 b. Plaintiffs’ opposition to be due February 9, 2012 25 c. Defendants’ reply to be due February 23, 2012 _________________________ R NIA PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED. ERED O ORD IT IS S NO el Conti ge Samu H ER LI RT 28 –2– FO Jud United States District Court Judge A 27 UNIT ED 26 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S 23 N F D IS T IC T O R C US_ACTIVE-107491821.2 STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT – Case No. 11-CV-04758-SC 1 2 DATED: November 29, 2011. 3 4 LAW OFFICES OF JANET LINDNER SPIELBERG By: 5 6 /S/ Janet Lindner Janet Lindner Attorney for Plaintiffs Tamar Davis Larsen and Kimberly S. Sethavanish 7 8 DATED: November 29, 2011. REED SMITH LLP 9 By: 10 Donald P. Rubenstein Heather B. Hoesterey Attorneys for Defendant Chipita America, Inc. 11 12 13 DATED: November 29, 2011. KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 14 By: 15 16 /S/ Beth M. Weinstein C. Robert Boldt Beth M. Weinstein Attorneys for Defendant Nonni’s Foods LLC 17 18 19 20 FILER’S ATTESTATION: Pursuant to General Order 45, Section X.B regarding signatures, I attest under the penalty of perjury that the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from its signatories. 21 22 DATED: November 29, 2011. KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 23 24 By: /S/ Beth M. Weinstein Beth M. Weinstein 25 26 27 28 –3– US_ACTIVE-107491821.2 STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT – Case No. 11-CV-04758-SC CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1 2 I hereby certify that I filed the foregoing STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 3 TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT AND 4 TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which 5 will automatically send email notification of such filing to the following attorneys of record: 6 7 8 Michael D. Braun Email: service@braunlawgroup.com Heather B. Hoesterey Email: hhoesterey@reedsmith.com Janet Lindner Spielberg Email: jlspielberg@jlslp.com Attorneys for Defendant Chipita America, Inc. 9 10 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 11 12 This 29th day of November, 2011. 13 s/ Beth M. Weinstein Beth M. Weinstein 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 –4– US_ACTIVE-107491821.2 STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT – Case No. 11-CV-04758-SC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?