Reeves & Associates, PLC v. Muller
ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE FROM DEFENDANT AND RESETTING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE HEARING Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 1/24/2013 08:00 AM. Show Cause Response due by 1/17/2013.. Signed by Judge Alsup on 1/10/13. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2013) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/10/2013: # 1 Certificate of Service) (tlS, COURT STAFF).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
No. C 11-04762 WHA
REEVES & ASSOCIATES, PLC,
ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE
FROM DEFENDANT AND RESETTING
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE HEARING
MATTHEW D. MULLER, AND DOES 125, Inclusive,
By order dated December 24, 2012, plaintiff’s request for an order requiring pro se defendant
Matthew Muller to show cause why he should not be held in contempt for violating a stipulated
order for injunctive relief and protective order was granted (Dkt. No. 41). A show-cause hearing
was scheduled for January 10, 2013. The order to show cause required the parties to file written
responses by January 7. Defendant has failed to respond in any manner to plaintiff’s motion or to
this Court’s recent orders (Dkt. Nos. 35 and 41). On January 9, the day before the hearing,
defendant Muller left a voice message stating that he was “incapacitated” and alluding to medical
issues. As defendant is an attorney, he should be aware that such ex parte communications with the
Court are improper. If defendant wished to request a continuance, he should have done so by proper
motion supported by sworn declaration, filed well in advance of the hearing date.
Counsel for plaintiff appeared at the January 10 hearing and requested the Court issue an
order finding defendant in contempt of the stipulated protective order and requiring defendant to pay
plaintiff’s attorney’s fees. Defendant is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why such an order
should not be issued against him. Defendant must respond by filing a sworn declaration by NOON
ON JANUARY 17.
An order to show cause hearing is hereby set for 8 A.M. ON JANUARY 24.
Defendant is warned that failure to respond to this order may result in a contempt order being
entered against him. Plaintiff shall serve this order on defendant via email and United States mail
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 10, 2013.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?