Business Integration Technology, Inc. v. Mulesoft,Inc., et al

Filing 76

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 74 Stipulation to Enlarge Time for Defendant to Respond, filed by Philip Bradley, MuleSoft, Inc. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D Laporte on 1/3/2012. (kns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2012)

1
2
3

CLAASSEN, Professional Corporation
John S. Claassen, Esq. (212954)
1999 Harrison St., Suite 2210
Oakland, CA 94612
Tel.: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

4
5

Attorney for Defendants
MULESOFT, INC. and
PHILIP T. BRADLEY

6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
)
)
)
MULESOFT, INC. & PHILIP T.
)
BRADLEY,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
____________________________________ )
BUSINESS INTEGRATION
TECHNOLOGY, INC.,

Case No. 3:11-cv-04782-EDL
STIPULATION TO ENLARGE TIME
FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT (Local Civ. R. 6-1(b));
[PROPOSED] ORDER; and
DECLARATION OF JOHN S.
CLAASSEN, ESQ.

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO ENLARGE TIME FOR DEFENDANTS
TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

3:11-cv-04782-EDL

1
2

STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME FOR
DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

3

Defendants MuleSoft, Inc. and Philip T. Bradley (“Defendants”) and plaintiff Business

4

Integration Technology (“Plaintiff”) hereby recite, stipulate, and agree pursuant to Civil Local

5

Rule 6-1(b) as follows:

6

RECITALS

7

A. Plaintiff filed Document 70, its Second Amended Complaint, on December 19, 2011.

8

B. Defendants’ answer or other response to Document 70 must be filed pursuant to
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(3) no later than January 3, 2012.

9
10

C. Defendants have sought Plaintiff’s stipulation to the enlargement of Defendants’ time

11

to answer or otherwise respond to Document 70 for ten (10) days until no later than

12

January 13, 2012.
D. Plaintiff is agreeable to such enlargement of time.

13
14
15
16
17

//
//
//
//
//

18
19
20
21

//
//
//
//

22

//

23

//

24

//

25

//

26

//

27

//

28

STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO ENLARGE TIME FOR DEFENDANTS
TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

-1-

3:11-cv-04782-EDL

1

STIPULATION

2

Accordingly, the parties stipulate and agree as follows:

3

1. Defendants’ answer or other response to Document 70 shall be filed and served no

4
5
6

later than January 13, 2012.
Respectfully submitted,
DATED: 12/30/2011

CLAASSEN, Professional Corporation

7
8

By: /s/ John S. Claassen, Esq.
John S. Claassen, Esq.
Attorney for Defendants
MULESOFT, INC. & PHILIP T. BRADLEY

9
10
11
12

DATED: 12/30/2011

MOSER & MARSALEK, P.C.

13

By: /s/ Jennifer Betz, Esq.
Jennifer Betz, Esq. (admitted pro hac)
Attorneys for Plaintiff
BUSINESS INTEGRATION TECHNOLOGY,
INC.

14
15
16

[PROPOSED] ORDER

17
18
19

For good cause shown, the above stipulation of the parties is adopted as the Order of the
Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

20
21

DATED: January 3, 2012

___________________________________
Elizabeth D. Laporte
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

22
23

//
//

24
//
25
26

//
//

27
28

STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO ENLARGE TIME FOR DEFENDANTS
TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

-2-

3:11-cv-04782-EDL

1
2

DECLARATION OF JOHN S. CLAASSEN, ESQ.
I, John S. Claassen, state as follows:

3

1.

I am admitted to practice before this Court. I am counsel of record of defendants

4

MuleSoft, Inc. and Philip T. Bradley in the above-captioned action. Unless otherwise indicated,

5

I have personal knowledge of the facts alleged herein and could and would testify competently

6

thereto if asked to do so.

7

2.

I have sought on behalf of Defendants an enlargement of Defendants’ time to

8

answer or otherwise respond to Document 70 to accommodate my personal plans during the

9

holidays.

10

3.

Both Plaintiff and Defendants have previously sought and received enlargements

11

of time in this action. Such enlargements of time are documented in Documents 5, 19, 21, and

12

44.

13
14
15
16

4.

I do not believe that the enlargement of time requested through the parties’

stipulation will affect any existing deadlines imposed by the Court.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is
true and correct. Executed this 30th day of December 2012 at Oakland, California.

17

/s/John S. Claassen, Esq.
___________________________________
JOHN S. CLAASSEN, ESQ.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO ENLARGE TIME FOR DEFENDANTS
TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

-3-

3:11-cv-04782-EDL

1
2
3
4

CERTIFICATON
I, John S. Claassen, Esq., am the ECF User whose identification and password are being
used to file the STIPULATION TO ENLARGE TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (Local Civ. R. 6-1(b)); and [PROPOSED]

5

ORDER. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that Jennifer Betz, Esq. has

6

concurred in this filing.

7

Respectfully submitted,

8
9

DATED: Dec. 30, 2011

CLAASSEN, Professional Corporation

10
By: /s/ John S. Claassen
John S. Claassen, Esq.
Attorney for Defendants
MULESOFT, INC. & PHILIP T. BRADLEY

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO ENLARGE TIME FOR DEFENDANTS
TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

-4-

3:11-cv-04782-EDL