Hill v. Virga et al
Filing
5
ORDER RE: CLAIM 6 (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
DAVID LEE HILL,
9
10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
11
No. C 11-4793 SI (pr)
Petitioner,
ORDER RE. CLAIM 6
v.
T. VIRGA, warden,
12
Respondent.
/
13
14
David Lee Hill, an inmate at the California State Prison - Sacramento, filed this pro se
15
action for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254. The court reviewed the
16
petition, dismissed the Eighth Amendment portion of Claim # 1, and all of Claim # 6 and Claim
17
# 9, and ordered respondent to show cause why the petition should not be granted as to several
18
other claims.
19
In Claim 6, petitioner had alleged that the trial court violated petitioner's right to due
20
process when it admitted the rebuttal evidence. The court dismissed Claim 6 because petitioner
21
did not state any facts concerning this claim, nor did he make any legal argument in support of
22
it. The court explained that, if petitioner wanted to pursue this claim, he had to file an
23
amendment to his petition stating the facts supporting this claim for habeas relief. Petitioner did
24
so. In his "amendment to petition" (docket # 4), petitioner alleged that his right to due process
25
was violated by the admission of rebuttal evidence that included "gory photographs of a double
26
murder unrelated to petitioner," "police officer testimony 'rebutting' witness Jones's testimony
27
on a collateral matter that the prosecutor himself had elicited," and gang testimony from witness
28
Telfor. Docket # 4 at 2-3. Now that petitioner has stated the facts supporting it, Claim 6 states
1
a cognizable claim for habeas relief and warrants a response. If and when respondent files an
2
answer to the petition, he should include a discussion of Claim 6 with the discussion of the other
3
claims identified in the order to show cause.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
DATED: November 14, 2011
______________________
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?