Securities And Exchange Commission v. Hovan et al

Filing 38

ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 1/17/2013 01:30 PM.Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 11/20/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2012)

Download PDF
1 MARC J. FAGEL (Cal. Bar No. 154425) SUSAN F. LAMARCA (Cal. Bar No. 215231) 2 lamarcas@sec.gov KAREN KREUZKAMP (Cal. Bar No. 246191) 3 kreuzkampk@sec.gov 4 Attorneys for Plaintiff SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 5 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2600 San Francisco, California 94104 6 Telephone: (415) 705-2500 Facsimile: (415) 705-2501 7 8 9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 14 15 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Case No. CV-11-4795-RS 16 17 Plaintiff, v. [PROPPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 18 KURT S. HOVAN, LISA B. HOVAN, EDWARD J. HOVAN, JR., and HOVAN 19 CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, 20 Defendants. 21 22 23 24 This matter came before the Court on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s 25 administrative motion to continue the hearing currently scheduled for November 29, 2012 to show 26 cause why this case should not be dismissed, based upon an atniticpated settlement. 27 28 For good cause show, the Commission’s motion is hereby GRANTED. 1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties are required to appear before the Court on 2 January 17, 2013, at 1:30 p.m., Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Ave., San Francisco, CA, 3 to show cause why this case should not be dismissed, unless this case is dismissed prior to that time. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 8 9 DATED: 11/20/12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. CV-11-4795-RS -2- [Proposed] Order re Mot. to Continue Hearing

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?