Smith v. Johnson

Filing 24

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION. By order filed April 25, 2012, the Court dismissed plaintiff's complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. The Court afforded plaintiff the opportunity to file a First Amended Complaint no later than May 11, 2012. To date, plaintiff has not filed a First Amended Complaint. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the Court's order filed April 25, 2012, the complaint is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on May 21, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/21/2012) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/21/2012: # 1 Certificate of Service) (tlS, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 11 FREDERICK SMITH, 12 Plaintiff, 13 No. C 11-4823 MMC ORDER DISMISSING ACTION v. 14 HAROLD P. JOHNSON, 15 Defendant. / 16 17 By order filed April 25, 2012, the Court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint for failure to 18 state a claim upon which relief could be granted. The Court afforded plaintiff the 19 opportunity to file a First Amended Complaint no later than May 11, 2012. To date, plaintiff 20 has not filed a First Amended Complaint. 21 Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the Court’s order filed April 25, 2012, the 22 complaint in the above-titled action is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 23 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). 24 The Clerk shall close the file. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 28 Dated: May 21, 2012 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?