Laureles v. Grounds
Filing
5
ORDER OF TRANSFER (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2011)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
8
WILLIAM LAURELES,
Petitioner,
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
No. C 11-4831 SI (pr)
ORDER OF TRANSFER
v.
RANDY GROUNDS; et al.,
Respondents.
/
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
William Laureles, an inmate at the Correctional Training Facility in Soledad, California,
has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, to challenge the sentence
he received from the Riverside County Superior Court. His claim wears a somewhat unusual
cloak – as he argues that prison officials have failed in their duty under California Penal Code
§ 1170(d) to refer his case to the sentencing court for sentence correction – but his legal claim
is that his Three-Strikes sentence violates the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause
because not all Three-Strikes eligible defendants receive Three-Strikes sentences and therefore
the sentencing scheme is being applied in a non-uniform, disparate and unequal manner.
Laureles' challenge is to the sentence imposed and not to the execution of his sentence. The
county in which he was convicted and sentenced is Riverside County, within the venue of the
Central District of California. The facility Laureles is incarcerated at is in Monterey County,
within the venue of the Northern District of California. Venue is proper in a habeas action in
either the district of confinement or the district of conviction, 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d); however, a
petition challenging a conviction or the sentence imposed is preferably heard in the district of
conviction. See N. D. Cal. Habeas L.R. 2254-3(b). Because the conviction occurred in the
1
Central District of California, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) and Habeas L.R. 2254-3(b), and
2
in the interests of justice, this action is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for
3
the Central District of California. The clerk shall transfer this matter forthwith.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: October 31, 2011
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?