M.G. v. Contra Costa County et al
Filing
87
ORDER DISMISSING CASE AND VACATING HEARING. Signed by Judge Alsup on August 21, 2013. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2013)
1 JOHN L. BURRIS, Esq. SBN 69888
DeWITT M. LACY, Esq. SBN 236229
2 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS
Airport Corporate Centre
3 7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120
Oakland, California 94621
4 Telephone: (510) 839-5200
Facsimile: (510) 839-3882
5 dewitt.lacy@johnburrislaw.com
GAYLA B. LIBET, Esq. SBN 109173
6 LAW OFFICES OF GAYLA B. LIBET
486 41st Street, #3
7 Oakland, California 94609
Telephone and Facsimile: (510)420-0324
8
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
M.G. by and through his Guardian ad Litem,
13 LASHON GOODWIN,
Case No.: C11- 04853 WHA
NOTICE OF DISMISSAL
14
15
Plaintiffs,
v.
HONORABLE JUDGE WILLIAM ALSUP
16 ANTHONY PERRY, individually and in his
official capacity as deputy sheriff for County of
17 Contra Costa; SEAN WELCH, individually and
in his capacity as deputy sheriff for County of
18 Contra Costa,
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Defendants.
1
2
PURSUANT TO SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, Plaintiffs hereby dismiss the instant
action with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a) (1), each side to bear their own fees and costs.
3
4
5 DATED: August 20, 2013
LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS
6
7
8
By: /s/ DeWitt M. Lacy
DEWITT M. LACY
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
9 DATED: August 20, 2013
LAW OFFICES OF GAYLA B. LIBET
10
11
12
By: /s/ Gayla B. Libet
Gayla B. Libet
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
1
2
3
ORDER
4
5
6
The above-noted action is hereby dismissed with prejudice, each side to their own fees and
costs. The August 21 status conference is VACATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
August 21, 2013.
8 Dated: ____________
7
9
______________________________________
HONORABLE JUDGE WILLIAM H. ALSUP
William Alsup
United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?