Hunter v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 191

[Proposed] Verdict Form. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on August 7, 2013. (jsclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/7/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 Northern District of California United States District Court 11 12 13 DARRELL HUNTER, Plaintiff, Case No. CV 11-4911 JSC [PROPOSED] VERDICT FORM v. 14 15 DEPUTY ADAM BURLESON, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 1. Has Plaintiff Darrell Hunter proven that any of the following defendants used excessive force against Plaintiff on December 7, 2010? Deputy Adam Burleson: Yes____ No____ Deputy Mario Gonzales: Yes____ No____ Deputy William James: Yes____ No____ Deputy Frank Lu: Yes____ No____ Deputy Jurnation Reymundo: Yes____ No____ 25 26 27 28 If you answered “no” as to all of the defendants, sign and turn in this form to the Deputy Clerk. If you answered “yes” as to any of the defendants, please answer Question No. 2. 1 2. Has Plaintiff proven that defendant Sr. Deputy Mark Nuti knew, or should have 2 known, that the other defendant(s) used or intended to use excessive force against Plaintiff 3 Darrell Hunter and that Sr. Deputy Nuti failed to act to prevent the other defendant(s) from 4 engaging in such conduct? Yes____ 5 6 7 3. No____ Has Plaintiff Darrell Hunter proven that any of the following defendants’ conduct was malicious or committed in reckless disregard of Darrell Hunter’s rights? Yes____ No____ Deputy Mario Gonzales: Yes____ No____ 10 Deputy William James: Yes____ No____ 11 Northern District of California Deputy Adam Burleson: 9 United States District Court 8 Deputy Frank Lu: Yes____ No____ 12 Deputy Jurnation Reymundo: Yes____ No____ 13 Deputy Mark Nuti: Yes____ No____ 14 15 4. Do you award Plaintiff Darrell Hunter punitive damages? 16 Yes____ 17 No____ 18 19 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 22 Dated: August 7, 2013 _________________________________ JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?