Hunter v. City and County of San Francisco et al
Filing
68
SCHEDULING ORDER as to 31 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment. Responses due by 1/31/2013. Replies due by 2/14/2013. Motion Hearing set for 2/28/2013 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom F, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on November 9, 2012. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/9/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
Northern District of California
United States District Court
11
DARRELL HUNTER,
Plaintiff,
12
Case No. 11-4911 JSC
SCHEDULING ORDER
v.
13
14
15
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
On October 10, 2012, the Court granted in part, denied in part, and deferred in part
18
19
Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. (Dkt. No. 59.) The motion was deferred in part
20
so that Plaintiff could obtain additional Monell discovery. On November 6, 2012, the Court
21
established a schedule for all remaining discovery in this action. In accordance with this schedule,
22
Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on the deferred issues is due
23
January 31, 2013; Defendants’ reply, if any, is due February 14, 2013. The Court will hear the motion
24
on February 28, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom F, 450 Golden Gate Ave., San Francisco, California.
On November 5, 2012, Plaintiff filed a Request to Extend the Time to Serve Defendants
25
26
Dempsey and Hennessey (Dkt. No. 64). Defendants’ response to this motion is due by November 21,
27
2012.
28
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3
Dated: November 9, 2012
_________________________________
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Northern District of California
United States District Court
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?