Hunter v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 86

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL (Dkt. No. 85). Signed by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on February 6, 2013. (jsclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2013)

Download PDF
I 2 J 4 5 IN THE LINITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTIIERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 8 9 DARRELL HLNTER, l0 Plaintiff, 11 12 LiC OE i5 5 ao t3 r'\ rho r-.t o thL i= V. 9IrY_4ND couNrY oF sAN FRANCISCO, et a1., l4 l5 Defendants. cA l-.] I6 17 .Hk z t8 l9 20 2l 22 ZJ 24 25 26 27 The Court has reviewed Plaintiff s Administrative Motion to File Under Seal (Dkt. No. 85) which relates to his opposition to Defendant's Motion for partial Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 31). Plaintiff indicates that he needs to meet and confer with counsel for Defendants regarding which portions of his filings should be filed under seal and he anticipates filing something in one or two days. Plaintiff s opposition was due on Februarv 5. 2013; however, Plaintiff has yet to file a copy of his opposition with the court. By 10:00 a.m tomorrow, February 7,2013, Plaintiff shall deliver aChambers copy of his opposition brief and all related filings. The documents shall be placed in a sealed envelope, and clearly be marked as "Chambers Copies.,, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 6,2013 28 TES MAGISTRA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?