Hunter v. City and County of San Francisco et al
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL (Dkt. No. 85). Signed by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on February 6, 2013. (jsclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2013)
IN THE LINITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTIIERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9IrY_4ND couNrY oF sAN
The Court has reviewed Plaintiff s Administrative
Motion to File Under Seal (Dkt. No.
85) which relates to his opposition to Defendant's
Motion for partial Summary Judgment
(Dkt. No. 31). Plaintiff indicates that he needs to
meet and confer with counsel for
Defendants regarding which portions of his filings
should be filed under seal and he
anticipates filing something in one or two days. Plaintiff
s opposition was due on Februarv 5.
2013; however, Plaintiff has yet to file a copy of his
opposition with the court. By 10:00 a.m
tomorrow, February 7,2013, Plaintiff shall deliver aChambers
copy of his opposition brief
and all related filings. The documents shall be placed
in a sealed envelope, and clearly be
marked as "Chambers Copies.,,
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 6,2013
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?