Capps v. Motion Picture Industry Pension & Health Plans et al
Filing
16
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 14 Extend Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, filed by Motion Picture Industry Pension & Health Plans. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D Laporte on 11/29/2011. (kns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
MICHAEL A. VANIC, CA SBN: 073486
mike.vanic@dbr.com
JOSEPH C. FAUCHER, CA SBN: 137353
Joe.faucher@dbr.com
DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP
1800 Century Park East
Suite 1400
Los Angeles, CA 90067-1517
Telephone:
(310) 203-4000
Facsimile:
(310) 229-1285
6
7
8
Attorneys for Defendants MOTION PICTURE
INDUSTRY PENSION PLAN and MOTION
PICTURE INDUSTRY HEALTH PLAN
(incorrectly sued herein as Motion Picture Industry
Pension & Health Plans)
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
12
13
GORDON CAPPS,
Plaintiff,
14
15
v.
16
MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY
PENSION & HEALTH PLANS AND
BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA,
17
Case No. 3:11-CV-04914-EDL
[PROPOSED] ORDER IN SUPPORT OF
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S
COMPLAINT
Defendant.
18
19
20
ORDER
21
Based on the forgoing, the Court finds that good cause exists to extend the
22
deadline for Defendants Motion Picture Industry Pension Plan and Motion Picture
23
Industry Health Plan to respond to the Complaint to December 9, 2011 and
24
therefore ORDERS that the date is so extended.
25
26
November 29, 2011
DATED: _________________
27
____________________________
Hon. Elizabeth D. Laporte
United States Magistrate Judge
28
D RINKER B IDDLE &
R EATH LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
LOS A NG EL ES
ORDER
CASE NO. 3:11-CV-04914-EDL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?