Stevenson et al v. City and County of San Francisco et al
Filing
60
ORDER REFERRING TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO COMPEL. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 9, 2015. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
11
AARON C. STEVENSON and KEVIN D.
TAYLOR,
No. C 11-4950 MMC
12
Plaintiffs,
14
ORDER REFERRING TO MAGISTRATE
JUDGE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
COMPEL
v.
13
THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
/
17
18
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 72-1, defendants’ Motion to Compel, filed January 9,
19
2015, and all further discovery matters, are hereby REFERRED to a Magistrate Judge to
20
be heard and considered at the convenience of the assigned Magistrate Judge’s calendar.
21
After the parties have met and conferred, see Civil L.R. 37-1, the parties shall
22
prepare a joint letter of not more than 8 pages explaining the dispute; up to 12 pages of
23
attachments may be added. The joint letter must be electronically filed under the Civil
24
Events category of “Motions and Related Filings > Motions - General > Discovery Letter
25
Brief.” The Magistrate Judge to whom the matter is assigned will advise the parties as to
26
how that Magistrate Judge intends to proceed. The Magistrate Judge may issue a ruling,
27
order more formal briefing, or set a telephone conference or a hearing.
28
//
1
2
The parties will be advised of the date, time and place of the next appearance, if
any, by notice from the assigned Magistrate Judge’s chambers.
3
The February 13, 2015 hearing noticed before the undersigned is VACATED.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated: January 9, 2015
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?