Ambrosio et al v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's Under Policy No. B0146LDUSA0701030
Filing
43
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND PLAINTIFFS' DEADLINE TO AMEND PLEADINGS. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 4/17/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2012)
1
4
GEORGE DONALDSON (SBN 79971)
LAW OFFICES OF
GEORGE DONALDSON
2298 Durant Avenue
Berkeley, CA 94707
Telephone: (510) 548-7474
Facsimile: (510) 548-7488
5
Attorneys for Ambrosio Plaintiffs
2
3
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
WILLIAM AMBROSIO, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
13
14
15
16
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT
LLOYD'S UNDER POLICY NO.
B0146LDUSA0701030 and DOES 1 through
100, inclusive,
Defendants.
MICHAEL ALVARADO, et al.,
19
20
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND
PLAINTIFFS’ DEADLINE TO AMEND
PLEADINGS
v.
17
18
CASE NO. 3:11-cv-04956-RS
CASE NO. 3:11-cv-04957-RS
Plaintiffs,
v.
21
22
23
24
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT
LLOYD’S UNDER POLICY NO.
B0146LDUSA0701030, and DOES 1-100,
inclusive,
Defendants.
25
26
27
28
29
30
-1-
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND PLAINTIFFS’ DEADLINE TO AMEND PLEADINGS
3:11-cv-04956-RS
1
WILLIAM JAMISON, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
2
3
4
5
CASE NO. 3:11-cv-04958-RS
v.
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT
LLOYD'S UNDER POLICY NO.
B0146LDUSA0701030 and DOES 1 through
100, inclusive,
6
Defendants.
7
8
WOOD RIVER CAPITAL RESOURCES,
LLC, et al.,
9
10
11
12
13
Plaintiffs,
v.
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT
LLOYD'S UNDER POLICY NO.
B0146LDUSA0701030 and DOES 1 through
100,
Defendants.
14
15
HENRY JAMES ANDERSON, et al.
16
17
CASE NO. 3:11-cv-5759-RS
CASE NO. 3:11-cv-5760-RS
Plaintiffs,
v.
18
19
20
21
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT
LLOYD'S UNDER POLICY NO.
B0146LDUSA0701030 and DOES 1 through
100, inclusive,
Defendants.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
-2-
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND PLAINTIFFS’ DEADLINE TO AMEND PLEADINGS
3:11-cv-04956-RS
1
ROSEVILLE CAPITAL RESOURCES,
LLC; et al.,
2
Plaintiffs,
3
4
5
6
CASE NO. 3:11-cv-5761-RS
v.
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT
LLOYD'S UNDER POLICY NO.
B0146LDUSA0701030 and DOES 1 through
100, inclusive,
Defendants.
7
8
9
DEAN G. NOWACKI, et al.,
10
11
12
13
14
Plaintiffs,
v.
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT
LLOYD'S UNDER POLICY NO.
B0146LDUSA0701030 and DOES 1 through
100, inclusive,
Defendants.
15
16
17
OAKDALE HEIGHTS REDDING 1, LLC,
et al.,
20
21
22
CASE NO. 3:11-cv-6368-RS
Plaintiffs,
18
19
CASE NO. 3:11-cv-06366-RS
v.
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT
LLOYD'S UNDER POLICY NO.
B0146LDUSA0701030 and DOES 1 through
100,
Defendants.
23
24
Plaintiffs William Ambrosio, et al., Case Number 3:11-cv-04956-RS, by and through
25
their counsel of record, George Donaldson, Esq. from the Law Office of George Donaldson;
26
27
28
29
30
Plaintiffs Michael Alvarado, et al., Case Number 3:11-cv-04957-RS, by and through their
counsel of record, Jeffrey A. Feldman, Esq. from the Law Offices of Jeffrey A. Feldman;
-3-
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND PLAINTIFFS’ DEADLINE TO AMEND PLEADINGS
3:11-cv-04956-RS
1
2
Plaintiffs William Jamison, et al., Case Number 3:11-cv-04958-RS, by and through their
counsel of record, Val Hornstein, Esq. from the Hornstein Law Offices;
3
Plaintiffs Wood River Capital Resources, LLC, et al., Case Number 3:11-cv-05759-RS,
4
by and through their counsel of record, Jeffery J. Swanson, Esq. from the Law Offices of Jeffery
5
J. Swanson;
6
7
Plaintiffs Henry James Anderson, et al., Case Number 3:11-cv-5760-RS, by and through
their counsel of record, Richard S. Miller, Esq. from the Law Offices of Richard S. Miller;
8
9
Plaintiffs Roseville Capital Resources, LLC, et al., Case Number 3:11-cv-5761-RS, by
and through their counsel of record, Troy A. Thielemann, Esq. from Cappello & Noel LLP;
10
11
Plaintiffs Dean G. Nowacki, et al., Case Number 3:11-cv-06366-RS, by and through their
counsel of record, Patrick L. Deedon, Esq. from Maire & Burgess;
12
13
Plaintiffs Oakdale Heights Redding 1, LLC, et al., Case Number 3:11-cv-6368-RS, by
and through their counsel of record, Patrick L. Deedon, Esq. from Maire & Burgess;
Defendant Brit UW Limited (“Brit”), Case Numbers 3:11-cv-04956-RS; 3:11-cv-04957-
14
15
RS; 3:11-cv-04958-RS; 3:11-cv-05759-RS; 3:11-cv-5760-RS; 3:11-cv-5761-RS, 3:11-cv-06366-
16
RS; and 3:11-cv-06368-RS, by and through its counsel of record, Michael L. Fox, Esq. of
17
Sedgwick LLP, hereby stipulate as follows:
18
By order dated March 29, 2012, the Honorable Richard Seeborg granted Brit’s motion to
19
dismiss the complaints in each of the above-referenced actions, but allowed plaintiffs 20 days to
20
file an amended complaint as follows: “[P]laintiffs may, if they elect and have a good faith [sic]
21
for doing so, amend the pleadings to allege facts supporting claims that do not fall under the
22
Partial Professional Services Exclusion.” (ECF No. 41 in Case No. 3:11-cv-04956-RS, pg. 14:9-
23
10.)
24
Plaintiffs have asked Brit for an additional two weeks’ time to file amended pleadings in
25
the related cases so that the pleadings could be properly coordinated, to the extent practicable,
26
and to avoid an unnecessary duplication of labor and costs. Brit stipulates to the granting of a
27
two week extension for plaintiffs to amend their pleadings in accordance with the leave granted
28
29
30
-4-
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND PLAINTIFFS’ DEADLINE TO AMEND PLEADINGS
3:11-cv-04956-RS
1
in the March 29, 2012 Order, so that the new deadline for plaintiffs’ amended pleadings will be
2
May 2, 2012.
3
Therefore, the parties, by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate, subject to
4
the Court’s approval, that plaintiffs may file their amended complaint(s) in accordance with the
5
March 29, 2012 Order on or before May 2, 2012.
6
IT SO STIPULATED.
7
8
DATED: April 16, 2012
SEDGWICK LLP
By: /s/ Michael L. Fox
Michael L. Fox
Attorneys for Defendant
BRIT UW LIMITED
(sued as “Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s
Under Policy No. B0146LDUSA701030”)
9
10
11
12
13
DATED: April 16, 2012
Law Office of George Donaldson
By: /s/ George Donaldson
George Donaldson
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
William Ambrosio, et al.,
Case No. 3:11-cv-04956-RS
14
15
16
17
DATED: April 16, 2012
Hornstein Law Offices
18
By: /s/ Val Hornstein
Val Hornstein
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
William Jamison, et al.,
Case No. 3:11-cv-04958-RS
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
DATED: April 16, 2012
Law Offices of Jeffrey A. Feldman
By: /s/ Jeffrey A. Feldman
Jeffrey A. Feldman
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Michael Alvarado, et al.,
Case No. 3:11-cv-04957-RS
26
27
28
29
30
-5-
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND PLAINTIFFS’ DEADLINE TO AMEND PLEADINGS
3:11-cv-04956-RS
1
DATED: April 16, 2012
2
Law Offices of Jeffery J. Swanson
By: /s/ Jeffery J. Swanson
Jeffery J. Swanson
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Wood River Capital Resources, LLC, et al.,
Case Number 3:11-cv-05759-RS
3
4
5
6
DATED: April 16, 2012
By: /s/ Richard S. Miller
Richard S. Miller
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Henry James Anderson, et al.,
Case No. 3:11-cv-5760-RS
7
8
9
10
Law Offices of Richard S. Miller
DATED: April 16, 2012
Cappello & Noel LLP
11
By: /s/ Troy A. Thielemann
Troy A. Thielemann
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Roseville Capital Resources, LLC, et al.,
Case No. 3:11-cv-5761-RS
12
13
14
DATED: April 16, 2012
Maire & Burgess
15
By: /s/ Patrick L. Deedon
Patrick L. Deedon
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Dean G. Nowacki, et al.,
Case No. 3:11-cv-6366-RS
16
17
18
19
DATED: April 16, 2012
By: /s/ Patrick L. Deedon
Patrick L. Deedon
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Oakdale Heights Redding 1, LLC, et al.,
Case No. 3:11-cv-6368-RS
20
21
22
23
Maire & Burgess
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED
24
25
26
17
DATED: April ___, 2012
By:
The Honorable Richard Seeborg
U.S. District Judge, Northern District of California
27
28
29
30
-6-
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND PLAINTIFFS’ DEADLINE TO AMEND PLEADINGS
3:11-cv-04956-RS
1
2
Certification Pursuant to General Order No. 45(X)(B)
I, George Donaldson, certify that concurrence in the filing of the attached Joint
3
Stipulation to Extend Plaintiffs’ Deadline to Amend Pleadings has been obtained from each
4
signatory listed.
5
/s/George Donaldson
George Donaldson
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
-7-
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND PLAINTIFFS’ DEADLINE TO AMEND PLEADINGS
3:11-cv-04956-RS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?