Ambrosio et al v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's Under Policy No. B0146LDUSA0701030

Filing 48

JOINT STIPULATION FOR ORDER MODIFYING HEARING DATE AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE RELATING TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS. Motion Hearing set for 7/12/2012 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/25/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2012)

4

Richard S. Miller (SBN 63760)
Caroline E. Gegg (SBN 179061)
LAW OFFICES OF RICHARD S. MILLER
1600 S. Main Street, Ste. 230
Walnut Creek, California 94596
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

5

Attorneys for Plaintiffs ANDERSON ET AL.

1
2
3

6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

WILLIAM AMBROSIO, an individual, et
al.,

10
11
12
13
14

Plaintiffs,
v.
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT
LLOYD’S UNDER POLICY NO.
B0146LDUSA0701030, and DOES 1
through 100, inclusive,
Defendants.

15
16

WILLIAM JAMISON, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

17
18
19
20
21
22

v.
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT
LLOYD’S UNDER POLICY NO.
B0146LDUSA070130, and DOES 1 through
100,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

3:11-cv-04956-RS
JOINT STIPULATION FOR ORDER
MODIFYING HEARING DATE AND
BRIEFING SCHEDULE RELATING
TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO
DISMISS
Judge: Hon. Richard Seeborg.

3:11-cv-04958-RS

23
24
25
26
27
28

____________________________________________________________________________________________________
-1Stipulation for Order Modifying Hearing Date and Briefing Schedule Relating to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss

1

HENRY JAMES ANDERSON, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

2
3
4
5

v.
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT
LLOYD’S UNDER POLICY NO.
B0146LDUSA0701030, and DOES 1-100,
inclusive,

6

Defendants.

7
8
9

ROSEVILLE CAPITAL RESOURCES,
LLC et al.,

10
11
12
13
14

Plaintiffs,
v.
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT
LLOYD’S UNDER POLICY NO.
B0146LDUSA0701030, and DOES 1-100,
inclusive,
Defendants.

15
16

DEAN NOWACKI, et al.,
17

Plaintiffs,
18
19
20
21
22
23

v.
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT
LLOYD’S UNDER POLICY NO.
B0146LDUSA0701030, and DOES 1-100,
inclusive,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

3:11-cv-05760-RS

4:11-cv-05761-RS

4:11-cv-06366-RS

24
25
26
27
28

____________________________________________________________________________________________________
-2Stipulation for Order Modifying Hearing Date and Briefing Schedule Relating to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss

1
2

OAKDALE HEIGHTS REDDING 1, LLC,
et al.,
Plaintiffs,

3
4
5
6

v.
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT
LLOYD’S UNDER POLICY NO.
B0146LDUSA0701030, and DOES 1-100,
inclusive,

7

Defendants.
8

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

4:11-cv-6368-RS

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

Plaintiffs William Ambrosio, et al., Case Number 3:11-cv-04956-RS, by and through their
counsel of record, George Donaldson, Esq. from the Law Office of George Donaldson;
Plaintiffs William Jamison, et al., Case Number 3:11-cv-04958-RS, by and through their
counsel of record, Val Hornstein, Esq. from the Hornstein Law Offices;
Plaintiffs Henry James Anderson, et al., Case Number 3:11-cv-5760-RS, by and through
their counsel of record, Richard S. Miller, Esq. from the Law Offices of Richard S. Miller;
Plaintiffs Roseville Capital Resources, LLC, et al., Case Number 4:11-cv-5761-RS, by and
through their counsel of record, Troy A. Thielemann, Esq. from Cappello & Noel LLP;
Plaintiffs Dean G. Nowacki et al., Case No. 4:11-cv-6366-RS, by and through their
counsel of record, Patrick Deedon, Esq. from Maire & Burgess; and
Plaintiffs Oakdale Heights Redding,1, LLC, Case No. 4:11-cv-6368-RS, by and through
their counsel of record, Patrick Deedon, Esq. from Maire & Burgess; and

22

Defendant Brit UW Limited (“Brit”), Case Numbers 3:11-cv-04956-RS; 3:11-cv-04958-

23

RS; 3:11-cv-5760-RS; 4:11-cv-5761-RS; 4:11-cv-6366-RS and 4:11-cv-6368, by and through its

24

counsel of record, Michael L. Fox, Esq. of Sedgwick LLP, hereby stipulate as follows.

25

Given the critical nature of the pleading, which is a Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiffs believe

26

they need additional time to consider and research the issues. A previous modification occurred in

27

April 2012, when Defendant Brit agreed to Plaintiffs' request for a two week extension of time to

28

file First Amended Complaints, which was effected by the parties entering into a Stipulation and
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
-3Stipulation for Order Modifying Hearing Date and Briefing Schedule Relating to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss

1

approved in an order by this Court.

2

Pursuant to Plaintiffs' request for additional time, Plaintiffs and Defendant Brit have agreed

3

to modify the hearing date, which is currently set for June 28, 2012, and the related briefing

4

schedule regarding Defendant Brit's Motion to Dismiss. Therefore, the parties stipulate by and

5

through their counsel of record, subject to the Court’s approval, that (1) Plaintiffs shall file and

6

serve their Opposition to Brit's Motion to Dismiss by June 13, 2012; (2) Brit shall file any Reply

7

by June 27, 2012; and (3) the hearing date shall be July 12, 2012, at 1:30 p.m. before the

8

Honorable Richard Seeborg in the above-referenced Court.

9

This Stipulation will not alter any other date, event or deadline fixed by the Court.

10
11
12

IT SO STIPULATED.
DATED: May 24, 2012

13

SEDGWICK LLP
By: /s/ Michael L. Fox
Michael L. Fox
Attorneys for Defendant
BRIT UW LIMITED
(sued as “Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s
Under Policy No. B0146LDUSA701030”)

14
15
16
17
18

DATED: May 24, 2012

Law Offices of George Donaldson
By: /s/ George Donaldson
George Donaldson
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
William Ambrosio, et al.,
Case No. 3:11-cv-04956-RS

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

DATED: May 24, 2012

Hornstein Law Offices
By: /s/ Val Hornstein
Val Hornstein
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
William Jamison, et al.,
Case No. 3:11-cv-04958-RS

27
28

____________________________________________________________________________________________________
-4Stipulation for Order Modifying Hearing Date and Briefing Schedule Relating to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss

1

DATED: May 24, 2011

Law Offices of Richard S. Miller
By: /s/ Richard S. Miller
Richard S. Miller
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Henry James Anderson, et al.,
Case No. 3:11-cv-5760-RS

2
3
4
5

DATED: May 24, 2012

Cappello & Noel LLP

6

By: /s/ Troy A. Thielemann
Troy A. Thielemann
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Roseville Capital Resources, LLC, et al.,
Case No. 4:11-cv-5761-RS

7
8
9
10

DATED: May 24, 2012

By: /s/ Patrick Deedon
Patrick Deedon
Attorneys for Dean Nowacki
Dean Nowacki et. al
Case No. 4:11-cv-6366-RS

11
12
13
14

Maire & Burgess

DATED: May 24, 2012

15

Maire & Burgess
By: /s/ Patrick Deedon
Patrick Deedon
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Oakdale Heights Redding 1, LLC
Case No. 4:11-cv-6368-RS

16
17
18
19

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED
20
21
22
23

25
DATED: May ___, 2012

By:
The Honorable Richard Seeborg
U.S. District Judge, Northern District of California

24
25
26
27
28

____________________________________________________________________________________________________
-5Stipulation for Order Modifying Hearing Date and Briefing Schedule Relating to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss