Yates v. Bill's Place et al

Filing 10

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE FOR THE PARTIES TO CONDUCT THE JOINT SITE INSPECTION of the premises be continued up to and including 5/30/12. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 4/17/12. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2012)

Download PDF
1 4 THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH (State Bar No. 074414) THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH, A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION 4328 Redwood Hwy., Suite 300 San Rafael, CA 94903 Telephone: 415/674-8600 Facsimile: 415/674-9900 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff CRAIG YATES 2 3 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) BILL’S PLACE; RONALD J. MIGUEL ) ) and RUTH I. MIGUEL, trustees of the RONALD J. and RUTH I. MIGUEL 1991 ) ) REVOCABLE TRUST; and DON D. ) DURHAM, an individual dba BILL’S ) PLACE, ) ) ) Defendants. ____________________________________) CASE NO. CV-11-4966-JCS CRAIG YATES, an individual, 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE FOR THE PARTIES TO CONDUCT THE JOINT SITE INSPECTION 18 19 Plaintiff CRAIG YATES, an individual and Defendants RONALD J. MIGUEL 20 and RUTH I. MIGUEL, trustees of the RONALD J. and RUTH I. MIGUEL 1991 REVOCABLE 21 TRUST; and DON D. DURHAM, by and through the parties respective counsel in the above- 22 mentioned case respectfully request and hereby make the following stipulation: 23 24 1. WHEREAS, all defendants in the above-captioned matter have been served with the summons and complaint; 25 2. WHEREAS, pursuant to the General Order 56 ¶ 3 & 4, the parties were to 26 have the joint site inspection completed by January 17, 2012; 27 /// 28 /// STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING THE DEADLINE FOR THE JOINT SITE INSPECTION 1 1 3. WHEREAS, defendants RONALD J. MIGUEL and RUTH I. MIGUEL, trustees 2 of the RONALD J. and RUTH I. MIGUEL 1991 REVOCABLE TRUST; and DON D. 3 DURHAM just filed an answer to plaintiff’s complaint on March 31, 2012; 4 4. WHEREAS, plaintiff’s counsel, Thomas E. Frankovich, is/will be out of the 5 country from March 13, 2012 through April 22, 2012, and will again be out of the country from 6 April 27, 2012 through May 15, 2012; 7 8 5. WHEREAS, the parties are currently in the process of coordinating a date(s) to conduct the joint site inspection in May 2012; and 9 6. WHEREAS, the parties, hereto agree, stipulate and respectfully request that the 10 last day for the parties and counsel to conduct the joint inspection of the premises be continued 11 up to and including May 30, 2012. 12 IT IS STIPULATED. 13 14 Dated: April 9, 2012 THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH, ESQ. A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION 15 16 By: /s/Thomas E. Frankovich Thomas E. Frankovich Attorney for Plaintiff CRAIG YATES 17 18 /// 19 /// 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING THE DEADLINE FOR THE JOINT SITE INSPECTION 2 1 Dated: April 10, 2012 2 JASON G. GONG, ESQ. LAW OFFICE OF JASON G. GONG 3 By: /s/Jason G. Gong Jason G. Gong Attorneys for Defendants RONALD J. MIGUEL and RUTH I. MIGUEL, trustees of the RONALD J. and RUTH I. MIGUEL 1991 REVOCABLE TRUST; and DON D. DURHAM, an individual dba BILL’S PLACE 4 5 6 7 8 ORDER 9 Order (56) joint inspection of the premises be continued up to and including May 30, 2012. S RT R NIA ER H 16 NO 15 _________________________________________ Honorable Judge Joseph C. Spero ro seph Judge United States Magistrate C. Spe Judge Jo FO 14 April 17 Dated: ________________, 2012 UNIT ED 13 ISTRIC ES D TC AT T RT U O 12 LI 11 IT IS SO ORDERED that the last day for the parties and counsel to conduct the General A 10 N F D IS T IC T O R C 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING THE DEADLINE FOR THE JOINT SITE INSPECTION 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?