Hung et al v. Tribal Technologies et al

Filing 24

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND VACATING HEARING Show Cause Response due by 12/16/2011.. Signed by Judge Alsup on December 12, 2011. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/12/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 12 13 14 No. C 11-04990 WHA Plaintiffs, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 CINDY K. HUNG, LI CHING CHU, and ROBERT CHING LIANG HUNG, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND VACATING HEARING v. TRIBAL TECHNOLOGIES and GLENBOROUGH 400 ECR, LLC, Defendants. / 15 16 On November 10, 2011, this action was reassigned to the undersigned judge. On 17 November 22, 2011, defendant Glenborough 400 ECR, LLC, renoticed its motion to dismiss, or 18 in the alternative, to stay the action (Dkt. No. 22). Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3, plaintiffs’ 19 opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion was due December 6. None was filed. 20 Accordingly, plaintiffs Cindy K. Hung, Li Ching Chu, and Robert Ching Liang Hung are hereby 21 ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why their claims against defendant Glenborough 400 ECR, LLC, 22 should not be dismissed for failure to oppose the motion. Plaintiffs must file a written response to 23 this order by DECEMBER 16, 2011. If no response is filed or if good cause is not shown, then the 24 motion may be granted. The motion hearing previously set for January 5, 2012, is VACATED. 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 28 Dated: December 12, 2011. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?