Nicoud v. Furukawa Electric Company LTD et al

Filing 17

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-1) TRANSFERRING CASE to the Eastern District of Michigan. In re: Automotive Wire Harness Systems Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 2311 (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2012)

Case MDL No. 2311 Document 183 Filed 02/17/12 Page 1 of 3
Filed: 02/17/12
U.S. District Court
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL
East Dist. of MI Detroit
on
MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: AUTOMOTIVE WIRE HARNESS
SYSTEMS ANTITRUST LITIGATION

MDL No. 2311

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO−1)

On February 7, 2012, the Panel transferred 1 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for
the Eastern District of Michigan for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28
U.S.C. §1407. See _F.Supp.2d_ (J.P.M.L. 2012). Since that time, no additional action(s) have been
transferred to the Eastern District of Michigan. With the consent of that court, all such actions have
been assigned to the Honorable Marianne O Battani.
It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are
common to the actions previously transferred to the Eastern District of Michigan and assigned to
Judge Battani.
Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict
Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. §1407 to the
Eastern District of Michigan for the reasons stated in the order of February 7, 2012, and, with the
consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Marianne O Battani.
This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States
District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall
be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the
Panel within this 7−day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

FOR THE PANEL:

Feb 17, 2012
Jeffery N. Lüthi
Clerk of the Panel
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the
original on file in this office.

Clerk, U.S. District Court
Eastern District of Michigan
By

Sarah Schoenherr
Deputy Clerk

Case MDL No. 2311 Document 183 Filed 02/17/12 Page 2 of 3

IN RE: AUTOMOTIVE WIRE HARNESS
SYSTEMS ANTITRUST LITIGATION

MDL No. 2311

SCHEDULE CTO−1 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS

DIST

DIV.

C.A.NO.

CASE CAPTION

ALABAMA SOUTHERN
ALS

1

11−00696

Sirmon et al v. Delphi Automotive LLP et al 12-10675

ARKANSAS EASTERN
ARE

4

11−00757

Landers Auto Group Number One Inc v. Delphi 12-10676
Automotive Systems LLC et al

CALIFORNIA NORTHERN
CAN
CAN
CAN
CAN

3
3
3
4

11−05057
11−05477
12−00258
11−05301

12-10677
Nicoud v. Furukawa Electric Company LTD et al
Budner et al v. Delphi Automotive LLP et al 12-10678
Maravilla et al v. Delphi Automotive LLP et al 12-10679
Kelly et al v. Delphi Automotive LLP et al 12-10680

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
DC

1

11−01892

MARTENS CARS OF WASHINGTON INC. v. 12-10681
FURUKAWA ELECTRIC CO., LTD. et al

LOUISIANA EASTERN
LAE
LAE
LAE
LAE
LAE

2
2
2
2
2

11−03177
12−00003
12−00048
12−00062
12−00171

12-10682
Muscara v. Delphi Automotive, LLP et al
Brock et al v. Delphi Automotive, LLP et al 12-10683
Keifer v. Delphi Automotive, LLP et al 12-10684
Byrne et al v. Delphi Automotive, LLP et al 12-10685
Josefsberg v. Delphi Automotive, LLP et al
12-10686

11−03092

Superstore Automotive, Inc. v. Delphi Automotive,
LLP et al
12-10687

MINNESOTA
MN

0

MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN
MSS

3

11−00647

12-10688

Case MDL No. 2311 Document 183 Filed 02/17/12 Page 3 of 3
Hammett Motor Company, Inc. v. Delphi Automotive
LLP et al
PUERTO RICO
PR

3

11−02176

Crespo v. Delphi Automotive LLP et al

12-10689

WEST VIRGINIA SOUTHERN
WVS

5

12−00079

Nickell v. Delphi Automotive LLP

12-10690