Northern California Glaziers Architectural Metal and Glass Workers Pension Plan et al v. Vaheid

Filing 39

ORDER Granting 38 MOTION to Continue JOINT REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 12/6/2013. Case Management Conference set for 12/13/2013 10:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 08/19/2013. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2013)

Download PDF
1 Michele R. Stafford, Esq. (SBN 172509) Muriel B. Kaplan, Esq. (SBN 124607) 2 SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2110 3 San Francisco, CA 94104 (415) 882-7900 4 (415) 882-9287 Facsimile mstafford@sjlawcorp.com 5 mkaplan@sjlawcorp.com 6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 7 Patricia Walsh, Esq. (SBN 121098) LEONIDOU & ROSIN PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 8 777 Cuesta Drive, Suite 200 Mountain View, California 94040 9 (650) 691-2888 pwalsh@alr-law.com 10 Attorneys for Defendants 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 NORTHERN CALIFORNIA GLAZIERS, Case No.: C11-5116 SC 14 ARCHITECTURAL METAL AND GLASS WORKERS PENSION PLAN, et al. JOINT REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT 15 Plaintiffs, CONFERENCE; and [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON 16 v. Date: Friday, August 23, 2013 17 HOSSEIN VAHEID, individually and dba Time: 10:00 a.m. Ctrm: 1, 17th Floor 18 UNITED GLASS & ALUMINUM; aka T P WINDOWS, INC., a California corporation, 450 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, California 19 Defendants. Judge: The Honorable Samuel Conti 20 21 22 Plaintiffs and Defendants both respectfully request that the Case Management 23 Conference scheduled for August 23, 2013, at 10:00 a.m., be continued for approximately ninety 24 (90) days, as follows: 25 1. The Parties recognize that this Court has granted several continuances of the Case 26 Management Conference. The Parties have attempted to work together over the past several 27 months to resolve several outstanding discrepancies with regard to the results of an audit taken of 28 payroll records. -1JOINT REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; and [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON Case No.: C11-5116 SC P:\CLIENTS\GLACL\United Glass & Aluminum\Pleadings\C11-5116 SC - Joint Request to Continue CMC 081413.docx 2. 1 An ADR telephone conference was conducted and both parties agreed to participate 2 in mediation within ninety (90) days. The parties did not receive the expected referral to 3 mediation, so prepared and submitted an ADR Stipulation, stipulating to mediation. There was a . Both parties are now in the process of 4 5 preparing for the mediation and a pre-mediation phone conference is scheduled for August 20, 6 2013. 7 3. Plaintiffs and Defendants herein respectfully request that the Case Management 8 Conference, currently scheduled for August 23, 2013, be continued for ninety (90) days to allow 9 the parties to participate in mediation. 10 4. There are no issues that need to be addressed by this Court at the currently 11 12 time and resources, both parties respectfully request that the Court continue the currently 13 scheduled Case Management Conference. 14 Dated: August 15, 2013 SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION 15 By: 16 17 18 Dated: August 15, 2013 /S/ Michele Stafford Attorneys for Plaintiffs LEONIDOU & ROSIN PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 19 By: 20 /S/ Patricia Walsh Attorneys for Defendants 21 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 Based on the foregoing, and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the currently set Case 12/13/2013 Management Conference is hereby continued to _______________, and all related deadlines are 25 extended accordingly. 26 08/19/2013 27 Date: ____________________ 28 _________________________________________ THE HONORABLE SAMUEL CONTI UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT -2JOINT REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; and [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON Case No.: C11-5116 SC P:\CLIENTS\GLACL\United Glass & Aluminum\Pleadings\C11-5116 SC - Joint Request to Continue CMC 081413.docx

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?