Martinez v. Wireless Lifestyle, Inc.

Filing 30

AMENDED ORDER re 29 Order on Ex Parte Application. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 11/15/2011. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2011)

Case3:11-cv-05132-CRB Document29

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Filed11/16/11 Page1 of 2

ANDREA M. KIMBALL (State Bar No. 196485)
SNR DENTON US LLP
4520 Main Street, Suite 1100
Kansas City, Missouri 6411 1-7700
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
MARIE LEGGON WRIGHTEN (State Bar No. 167221)
VIRGINIA K. YOUNG (State Bar No. 174384)
SNR DENTON US LLP
601 South Figueroa Street, Suite 2500
Los Angeles, California 900 17-5704
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: marie.wrightensnrdenton.com
virginia.young3snrdenton.com
Attorneys for Defendant
WIRELESS LIFESTYLE, INC.

11
12
13
-

IN THE U1\HTED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

__Q’

°<

f.

15

16

YASMIN MARTINEZ, individually and on
behalf of other persons similarly situated,
Plaintiff,

17
18
19
20

vs.
WIRELESS LIFESTYLE, INC.; and DOES
I through 10,
Defendant.

No. 3:1 1-cv-05132-CRB
AMENDED
[PROPOSEDJ ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANT WIRELESS LIFESTYLE,
INC.’S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO
MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND
HEARING DATE ON (1) MOTION TO
STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING
RESOLUTION OF MOTION TO
TRANSFER TO MDL AND (2) MOTION
FOR REMAND TO STATE COURT

21
22

Judge Charles R. Breyer

23
24
25

26
27

28
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON WIRELESS LIFESTYLE’S
EX PARTE APPLICATION
No. 3:1 1-cv-05132-CRB

Case3:11-cv-05132-CRB Document29

Filed11/16/11 Page2 of 2

1

After considering the papers and evidence submitted in support of Defendant Wireless

2

Lifestyle. Inc.’s (“Wireless Lifestyle”) Ex Parte Application to Modify Briefing Schedule and

3

Hearing Date on (1) Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Resolution of Motion to Transfer to

4

MDL and (2) Motion for Remand to State Court (“Ex Parte Application”), the Court HEREBY

5

GRANTS Wireless Lifestyle’s Ex Parte Application.

6

There is good cause for granting Wireless Lifestyle’s Ex Parte Application, as doing so

7

will serve judicial economy, prevent prejudice to Wireless Lifestyle, eliminate the potential for

8

conflicting pretrial rulings on issues common to the actions sought to be transferred to the MDL

9

(including jurisdiction determinations), and ensure that the actions proceed in an orderly,

10
11

Motion to Transfer to MDL (“Stay Motion”) will be due on November 22, 2011. Any reply

13

brief in support of the Stay Motion will be due on November 28, 2011. The hearing on the Stay
9th
Motion will be on December 2, 2011 at 10:00 a.m.

14
15

The Court vacates the December 16, 2011 hearing on Plaintiffs Motion for Remand

16

[Dkt 12] and orders that no briefs are due on Plaintiff s Motion for Remand. If the Stay Motion

17

is denied, the Court will set a briefing and hearing schedule on Plaintiffs Motion for Remand.
ITIS SO ORDERED.

19

27

ER

H

26

RT

25

harles
Judge C

NO

24

R NIA

23

D
Hon. Charles ERBreyer
RD R. E
SO District Court Judge
UnitedSStatesO
IT I
er

R. Brey

FO

22

LI

21

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

S

20

Dated: Nov. 15, 2011

A

18

UNIT
ED

z

opposition brief to Defendant Wireless Lifestyle’s Motion to Stay Action Pending Resolution of

12

D

coordinated fashion under the direction of the MDL court if they are transferred there. Any

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

28
[PROPOSEDI ORDER ON WIRELESS LIFESTYLE’S
EX PARTE APPLICATION
No. 3:1 I-cv-05132-CRB