Martinez v. Wireless Lifestyle, Inc.

Filing 30

AMENDED ORDER re 29 Order on Ex Parte Application. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 11/15/2011. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2011)

Download PDF
Case3:11-cv-05132-CRB Document29 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Filed11/16/11 Page1 of 2 ANDREA M. KIMBALL (State Bar No. 196485) SNR DENTON US LLP 4520 Main Street, Suite 1100 Kansas City, Missouri 6411 1-7700 Telephone: (816) 460-2400 Facsimile: (816) 531-7545 Email: MARIE LEGGON WRIGHTEN (State Bar No. 167221) VIRGINIA K. YOUNG (State Bar No. 174384) SNR DENTON US LLP 601 South Figueroa Street, Suite 2500 Los Angeles, California 900 17-5704 Telephone: (213) 623-9300 Facsimile: (213) 623-9924 Email: Attorneys for Defendant WIRELESS LIFESTYLE, INC. 11 12 13 - IN THE U1\HTED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA __Q’ °< f. 15 16 YASMIN MARTINEZ, individually and on behalf of other persons similarly situated, Plaintiff, 17 18 19 20 vs. WIRELESS LIFESTYLE, INC.; and DOES I through 10, Defendant. No. 3:1 1-cv-05132-CRB AMENDED [PROPOSEDJ ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT WIRELESS LIFESTYLE, INC.’S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE ON (1) MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING RESOLUTION OF MOTION TO TRANSFER TO MDL AND (2) MOTION FOR REMAND TO STATE COURT 21 22 Judge Charles R. Breyer 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER ON WIRELESS LIFESTYLE’S EX PARTE APPLICATION No. 3:1 1-cv-05132-CRB Case3:11-cv-05132-CRB Document29 Filed11/16/11 Page2 of 2 1 After considering the papers and evidence submitted in support of Defendant Wireless 2 Lifestyle. Inc.’s (“Wireless Lifestyle”) Ex Parte Application to Modify Briefing Schedule and 3 Hearing Date on (1) Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Resolution of Motion to Transfer to 4 MDL and (2) Motion for Remand to State Court (“Ex Parte Application”), the Court HEREBY 5 GRANTS Wireless Lifestyle’s Ex Parte Application. 6 There is good cause for granting Wireless Lifestyle’s Ex Parte Application, as doing so 7 will serve judicial economy, prevent prejudice to Wireless Lifestyle, eliminate the potential for 8 conflicting pretrial rulings on issues common to the actions sought to be transferred to the MDL 9 (including jurisdiction determinations), and ensure that the actions proceed in an orderly, 10 11 Motion to Transfer to MDL (“Stay Motion”) will be due on November 22, 2011. Any reply 13 brief in support of the Stay Motion will be due on November 28, 2011. The hearing on the Stay 9th Motion will be on December 2, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. 14 15 The Court vacates the December 16, 2011 hearing on Plaintiffs Motion for Remand 16 [Dkt 12] and orders that no briefs are due on Plaintiff s Motion for Remand. If the Stay Motion 17 is denied, the Court will set a briefing and hearing schedule on Plaintiffs Motion for Remand. ITIS SO ORDERED. 19 27 ER H 26 RT 25 harles Judge C NO 24 R NIA 23 D Hon. Charles ERBreyer RD R. E SO District Court Judge UnitedSStatesO IT I er R. Brey FO 22 LI 21 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S 20 Dated: Nov. 15, 2011 A 18 UNIT ED z opposition brief to Defendant Wireless Lifestyle’s Motion to Stay Action Pending Resolution of 12 D coordinated fashion under the direction of the MDL court if they are transferred there. Any N F D IS T IC T O R C 28 [PROPOSEDI ORDER ON WIRELESS LIFESTYLE’S EX PARTE APPLICATION No. 3:1 I-cv-05132-CRB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?