Full Association Business Services, Inc. v. Grcevich et al
Filing
27
ORDER REMANDING ACTION re 26 Response to Order to Show Cause filed by Full Association Business Services, Inc.. Signed by Judge Alsup on January 17, 2012. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/17/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
FULL ASSOCIATION BUSINESS
SERVICES, INC dba FABS,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
No. C 11-05169 WHA
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER REMANDING ACTION
15
PATRICIA GRCEVICH, DNJ
PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
SERVICES, INC. dba COMMON
INTEREST MANAGEMENT SERVICES,
DAN NELSON, AND DOES 1 to 100
inclusive,
16
Defendants.
13
14
/
17
18
In October 2011, this trade secrets action was removed from Contra Costa Superior Court
19
based on plaintiff’s sole federal claim for relief: RICO violation. Plaintiff recently amended the
20
complaint to removed its RICO claim. In the operative complaint, all claims for relief are
21
pursuant to California law. The parties are all residents of California. An order to show cause
22
why the action should not be remanded was issued (Dkt. No. 24). Plaintiff responded by agreeing
23
that the case should be remanded.
24
Section 1447(c), which applies to cases removed from state court, provides that “[i]f at
25
any time before final judgment it appears that the district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction,
26
the case shall be remanded.” A district court has discretion to exercise supplemental jurisdiction
27
over remaining state law claims after a sole federal claim is dismissed. Albingia Versicherungs
28
A.G. v. Schenker Intern. Inc., 344 F.3d 931, 938 (9th Cir. 2003).
1
In this action, judicial economy weighs against exercising supplemental jurisdiction. The
2
action was recently removed, no lengthy motions have been filed, and no substantive orders have
3
been issued. Thus, this action shall be remanded. The clerk shall close the file.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
Dated: January 17, 2012.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?