Hrdina v. World Savings Bank, FSB et al
Filing
63
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO RECONSIDER by Hon. William Alsup denying 60 Motion to Vacate.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2012)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
GEORGE HRDINA,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
No. C 11-05173 WHA
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER DENYING MOTION
TO RECONSIDER
WACHOVIA MORTGAGE
CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.
/
16
17
Pro se plaintiff recently filed a letter requesting reconsideration of a prior order denying
18
plaintiff’s request for a preliminary injunction. Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction
19
was denied because he failed to demonstrate a likelihood of imminent harm and success on the
20
merits. There is nothing in the letter to justify reconsideration under Rule 60 of the dismissal
21
order. Therefore, plaintiff’s motion for reconsider is DENIED.
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: August 20, 2012.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
