Hall v. Comcast Corporation et al
Filing
50
ORDER GRANTING 49 STIPULATION REGARDING EXTENSION OF DEADLINES. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 6/26/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/26/2013)
Case3:11-cv-05174-JSW Document49 Filed06/25/13 Page1 of 4
4
CAROLYN H. COTTRELL (SBN 166977)
SCHNEIDER WALLACE
COTTRELL KONECKY LLP
180 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: (415) 421-7100
Facsimile: (415) 421-7105
ccottrell@schneiderwallace.com
5
Attorney for Plaintiff and the Putative Class
1
2
3
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
9
10
LYNN HALL, individually and on behalf of
others similarly situated,
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING EXTENSION OF
DEADLINES
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
16
Case No.: 3:11-cv-05174-JSW
vs.
COMCAST CORPORATION, COMCAST
OF CALIFORNIA / COLORADO / TEXAS /
WASHINGTON, INC., COMCAST OF
CALIFORNIA / COLORADO /
WASHINGTON I, INC. and DOES 1 to 50
17
18
Defendants.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF DEADLINES
Hall v. Comcast Corporation, et al., Case No. 3:11-cv-05174-JSW
Case3:11-cv-05174-JSW Document49 Filed06/25/13 Page2 of 4
1
STIPULATION
2
3
4
5
6
Plaintiff Lynn Hall (“Plaintiff”), along with Defendant Comcast Corporation and Defendant
Comcast of California / Colorado / Washington I, Inc. (“Defendants”)(collectively, “the Parties”),
through their respective counsel present the following stipulation and proposed order regarding a
continuance of the upcoming deadline to file approval papers and/or stipulation of dismissal currently
set for tomorrow, June 26, 2013.
7
8
9
WHEREAS, on June 10, 2013, counsel for the Parties filed a Stipulation and Proposed Order
continuing the case management conference to August 30, 2013, and agreeing to file approval papers
and/or a stipulation of dismissal by June 26, 2013 [Dkt No. 47] ;
10
11
WHEREAS, on June 11, 2013, the Court signed the order continuing the case management
conference to August 30, 2013, at 1:30 p.m. [Dkt No. 48];
12
13
WHEREAS, counsel for Plaintiff has had a death in her family, and respectfully requests a twoweek extension to file approval papers and/or a stipulation of dismissal;
14
15
16
WHEREAS, the parties request that the deadline to file approval papers and/or a stipulation of
dismissal be extended to July 9, 2013. This request will not impact the case management conference
currently set for August 30, 2013, at 1:30 p.m.
17
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES:
18
19
The deadline to file approval papers and/or a stipulation of dismissal shall be extended to July 9,
2013.
20
21 DATED: June 25, 2013
SCHNEIDER WALLACE
COTTRELL KONECKY LLP
22
/s/ Carolyn H. Cottrell
CAROLYN H. COTTRELL
Attorneys for Plaintiff LYNN HALL and the Putative Class
23
24
25
26
27
28
//
//
//
//
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF DEADLINES
Hall v. Comcast Corporation, et al., Case No. 3:11-cv-05174-JSW
Case3:11-cv-05174-JSW Document49 Filed06/25/13 Page3 of 4
1 DATED: June 25, 2013
LAFAYETTE & KUMAGAI LLP
2
3
4
5
/s/ Rebecca K. Kimura
REBECCA K. KIMURA
Attorneys for Defendants COMCAST CORPORATION and
COMCAST OF CALIFORNIA / COLORADO /
WASHINGTON I, INC.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF DEADLINES
Hall v. Comcast Corporation, et al., Case No. 3:11-cv-05174-JSW
Case3:11-cv-05174-JSW Document49 Filed06/25/13 Page4 of 4
ORDER
1
The Court, having reviewed the Parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing, hereby orders
2
3
4
5
6
7
that the deadline to file approval papers and/or a stipulation of dismissal shall be extended to July 9,
2013.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 26, 2013
__________________________
HON. JEFREY S. WHITE
United States District Court
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF DEADLINES
Hall v. Comcast Corporation, et al., Case No. 3:11-cv-05174-JSW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?