Currie v. Lewis
Filing
28
ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer denying 23 Motion to Appoint Counsel (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service) (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/13/2013)
1
2
3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
ALDRIDGE CURRIE, G-44516,
Petitioner,
7
8
9
vs.
GREG D. LEWIS, Warden,
Respondent.
10
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. C 11-5194 CRB (PR)
ORDER
(Docket #23)
11
12
Petitioner has filed a notice of appeal and a request for a certificate of
13
appealability (COA) under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) and Federal Rule of Appellate
14
Procedure 22(b). He also has filed a motion for appointment of counsel on
15
appeal.
16
As noted in the court’s May 13, 2013 order denying the petition for a writ
17
of habeas corpus, a COA is granted as to petitioner’s Batson claim. But a COA is
18
denied as to petitioner’s other claims because petitioner has not demonstrated that
19
“reasonable jurists would find the district court's assessment of the constitutional
20
claims debatable or wrong.” Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).
21
22
23
Petitioner’s motion for appointment of counsel (docket # 23) is denied
without prejudice to his renewing the motion in the court of appeals.
The clerk shall forward to the court of appeals the case file with this order.
24
See United States v. Asrar, 116 F.3d 1268, 1270 (9th Cir. 1997).
25
SO ORDERED.
26
DATED: June 12, 2013
CHARLES R. BREYER
United States District Judge
27
28
N:\Currie, A.11-5194.coa.wpd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?