Currie v. Lewis

Filing 28

ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer denying 23 Motion to Appoint Counsel (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service) (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/13/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 ALDRIDGE CURRIE, G-44516, Petitioner, 7 8 9 vs. GREG D. LEWIS, Warden, Respondent. 10 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 11-5194 CRB (PR) ORDER (Docket #23) 11 12 Petitioner has filed a notice of appeal and a request for a certificate of 13 appealability (COA) under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) and Federal Rule of Appellate 14 Procedure 22(b). He also has filed a motion for appointment of counsel on 15 appeal. 16 As noted in the court’s May 13, 2013 order denying the petition for a writ 17 of habeas corpus, a COA is granted as to petitioner’s Batson claim. But a COA is 18 denied as to petitioner’s other claims because petitioner has not demonstrated that 19 “reasonable jurists would find the district court's assessment of the constitutional 20 claims debatable or wrong.” Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). 21 22 23 Petitioner’s motion for appointment of counsel (docket # 23) is denied without prejudice to his renewing the motion in the court of appeals. The clerk shall forward to the court of appeals the case file with this order. 24 See United States v. Asrar, 116 F.3d 1268, 1270 (9th Cir. 1997). 25 SO ORDERED. 26 DATED: June 12, 2013 CHARLES R. BREYER United States District Judge 27 28 N:\Currie, A.11-5194.coa.wpd

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?