Resilient Floor Covering Pension Trust Fund Board of Trustees et al v. Michael's Floor Covering, Inc.

Filing 167

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley denying 165 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/8/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 7 RESILIENT FLOOR COVERING PENSION TRUST FUND BOARD OF TRUSTEES, et al., Plaintiffs, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 v. MICHAEL’S FLOOR COVERING, INC., Case No. 11-cv-05200-JSC ORDER RE: ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION BRIEF UNDER SEAL Re: Dkt. No. 165 Defendant. Plaintiffs’ administrative motion to file their opposition to Defendant’s motion for 13 summary judgment under seal is now pending before the Court. (Dkt. No. 165.) Plaintiffs filed 14 the motion to seal because the brief includes references to information that Defendant previously 15 designated as confidential under the parties’ stipulated protective order. Under Civil Local Rule 16 79-5(e), Defendant, as the party who designated the material sought to be sealed as confidential, 17 had four days to file a declaration in accordance with Rule 79-5(d)(1)(A) establishing that the 18 material was properly sealable. See also Civ. L.R. 79-5(b) (defining sealable information as 19 “privileged, protectable as a trade secret or otherwise entitled to protection under the law”). 20 Defendant has not filed such a declaration and the time to do so has run. Accordingly, the 21 administrative motion to seal is DENIED and Plaintiffs shall file their opposition brief on the 22 public docket as specified in Rule 79-5(e)(2). 23 This Order disposes of Docket No. 165. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: June 8, 2016 26 27 28 JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?