Wilson v. Hedgpeth

Filing 53

ORDER RE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING. Signed by Judge Alsup on 2/6/14. (whalc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 KIMIKO KIMIO WILSON, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 Petitioner, No. C 11-05207 WHA v. 13 ANTHONY HEDGPETH, 14 Respondent. / 15 16 ORDER RE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING When petitioner Kimiko Wilson filed his habeas petition, he was not represented by 17 counsel. Thus, respondent has not had the opportunity to respond to any of the new arguments 18 that petitioner’s counsel raises in the traverse. Respondent may have until FEBRUARY 27, 2014, 19 20 AT NOON, to file a responsive brief, no longer than 10 pages, that addresses those new arguments. 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: February 6, 2014. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?