Wilson v. Hedgpeth
Filing
53
ORDER RE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING. Signed by Judge Alsup on 2/6/14. (whalc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
KIMIKO KIMIO WILSON,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
Petitioner,
No. C 11-05207 WHA
v.
13
ANTHONY HEDGPETH,
14
Respondent.
/
15
16
ORDER RE SUPPLEMENTAL
BRIEFING
When petitioner Kimiko Wilson filed his habeas petition, he was not represented by
17
counsel. Thus, respondent has not had the opportunity to respond to any of the new arguments
18
that petitioner’s counsel raises in the traverse. Respondent may have until FEBRUARY 27, 2014,
19
20
AT NOON,
to file a responsive brief, no longer than 10 pages, that addresses those new
arguments.
21
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: February 6, 2014.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?