Saffi et al v. Roark et al

Filing 18

ORDER GRANTING 17 Stipulation To Dismiss. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on May 29, 2012. (jswlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2012)

Download PDF
Case3:11-cv-05213-JSW Document17-1 Filed05/29/12 Page1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 STUART F. DELERY Acting Assistant Attorney General Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice ELIZABETH J. STEVENS VSBN 47445 Assistant Director, District Court Section Office of Immigration Litigation 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 REGAN HILDEBRAND MOBN 57438 Trial Attorney, District Court Section Office of Immigration Litigation U.S. Department of Justice PO Box 868, Ben Franklin Station Washington DC 20044 Phone: (202) 305-3797 Fax: (202) 616-8962 E-mail: Regan.Hildebrand@usdoj.gov Attorneys for Defendants 14 15 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 MOJIB SAFFI; ET AL., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) DAVID L. ROARK, ) DIRECTOR, UNITED STATES ) CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION ) SERVICES, TEXAS SERVICE ) CENTER; ET AL., ) ) Defendants. ) _________________________________ Case No. 3:11-cv-05213-JSW PROPOSED ORDER RE: JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS Immigration Case 27 28 Proposed Order Re: Joint Stipulation To Dismiss Saffi v. Roark, 3:11-cv-05213-JSW -1- Case3:11-cv-05213-JSW Document17-1 Filed05/29/12 Page2 of 2 The parties’ Joint Stipulation To Dismiss is hereby GRANTED. Plaintiffs’ 1 2 3 4 5 complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. Each side will bear their own fees and costs. May 29, 2012 DATED: _____________________ ________________________ Honorable Jeffery S. White United States District Court Judge United States District Court for the Northern District of California 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Proposed Order Re: Joint Stipulation To Dismiss Saffi v. Roark, 3:11-cv-05213-JSW -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?