Dixon v. San Francisco Police Department et al

Filing 5

Duplicate entry - see Docket #6

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

Northern District of California

3
4

HOWARD DIXON,

5

No. C 11-05217 MEJ
Plaintiff,

v.

SECOND ORDER TO
CONSENT/DECLINE

6
SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT,
7
8

Defendant.
_____________________________________/

9
10

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis application. On October 31, 2011,

12 United States District Judge for trial by November 15, 2011. Dkt. No. 4. Plaintiff has failed to
For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11 the Court ordered Plaintiff to consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction or request reassignment to a

13 respond.
14

This civil case was randomly assigned to the undersigned magistrate judge for all

15 purposes including trial. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the magistrate judges of this district
16 court are designated to conduct any and all proceedings in a civil case, including trial and entry of
17 final judgment, upon the consent of the parties. An appeal from a judgment entered by a magistrate
18 judge may be taken directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in the same
19 manner as an appeal from any other judgment of a district court.
20

You have the right to have your case assigned to a United States District Judge for trial and

21 disposition. Accordingly, Plaintiff shall inform the Court, by way of the enclosed form, whether he
22 consents to magistrate judge jurisdiction or requests reassignment to a United States District Judge
23 for trial. The consent/declination form shall be filed by November 28, 2011. As this is the second
24 such order, Plaintiff should be mindful that sanctions may be imposed for failure to comply, including
25 and up to dismissal of this case.
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.

1 Dated: November 18, 2011
_______________________________
Maria-Elena James
Chief United States Magistrate Judge
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

2
3
4
5
HOWARD DIXON,
6

Case Number: CV11-05217 MEJ
Plaintiff,

7

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
v.

8
SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT et
9 al,
10

Defendant.

/

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11
12 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
13
That on November 18, 2011, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said
14 copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said
envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located
15 in the Clerk's office.
16
17

Howard Dixon
18 2363 Grande Vista Place
Oakland, CA 94621
19
Dated: November 18, 2011
20

Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: Brenda Tolbert, Deputy Clerk

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2