International Longshore and Warehouse Union v. Pacific Maritime Association
Filing
36
ORDER ON MOTION TO CONTINUE HEARING by Hon. William Alsup granting in part and denying in part 32 Motion to Continue.(whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
INTERNATIONAL LONGSHORE AND
WAREHOUSE UNION,
Plaintiff,
12
13
No. C 11-05222 WHA
ORDER ON MOTION TO
CONTINUE HEARING
v.
14
PACIFIC MARITIME ASSOCIATION,
15
Defendant.
/
16
17
On January 23, 2012, plaintiff International Longshore and Warehouse Union submitted a
18
motion for a continuance of the deadline of January 25, for submitting any orders from the coast
19
arbitrator and for a continuance of the hearing set for January 26, 2012, on its motion for
20
confirmation and enforcement of a labor arbitration subpoena. Said motion was filed on
21
November 3, 2011. Plaintiff seeks a 13-week continuance of the hearing date. Plaintiff states
22
that a continuance is needed in order for plaintiff to have time to review production of the
23
documents received from defendant Pacific Maritime Association and to present its disputes to
24
the coast arbitrator and obtain a ruling. Defendant opposes the motion to continue.
25
The deadline to submit any orders from the coast arbitrator is postponed. The hearing set
26
for January 26, will not be continued. Instead, the parties should be prepared to provide a status
27
28
1
update and a reasonable time line for moving forward with the motion for confirmation and
2
enforcement of a labor arbitration subpoena.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated: January 25, 2012.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?