International Longshore and Warehouse Union v. Pacific Maritime Association

Filing 36

ORDER ON MOTION TO CONTINUE HEARING by Hon. William Alsup granting in part and denying in part 32 Motion to Continue.(whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 INTERNATIONAL LONGSHORE AND WAREHOUSE UNION, Plaintiff, 12 13 No. C 11-05222 WHA ORDER ON MOTION TO CONTINUE HEARING v. 14 PACIFIC MARITIME ASSOCIATION, 15 Defendant. / 16 17 On January 23, 2012, plaintiff International Longshore and Warehouse Union submitted a 18 motion for a continuance of the deadline of January 25, for submitting any orders from the coast 19 arbitrator and for a continuance of the hearing set for January 26, 2012, on its motion for 20 confirmation and enforcement of a labor arbitration subpoena. Said motion was filed on 21 November 3, 2011. Plaintiff seeks a 13-week continuance of the hearing date. Plaintiff states 22 that a continuance is needed in order for plaintiff to have time to review production of the 23 documents received from defendant Pacific Maritime Association and to present its disputes to 24 the coast arbitrator and obtain a ruling. Defendant opposes the motion to continue. 25 The deadline to submit any orders from the coast arbitrator is postponed. The hearing set 26 for January 26, will not be continued. Instead, the parties should be prepared to provide a status 27 28 1 update and a reasonable time line for moving forward with the motion for confirmation and 2 enforcement of a labor arbitration subpoena. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: January 25, 2012. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?