Marsh et al v. Zaazoom Solutions, LLC et al
Filing
30
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 29 TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT ENTERED AGAINST DEFENDANTS MULTIECOM, LLC AND ONLINE RESOURCE CENTER, LLC. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 11/18/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2011)
*E-Filed 11/18/11*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
KRONENBERGER ROSENFELD, LLP
Karl S. Kronenberger (CA Bar No. 226112)
Jeffrey M. Rosenfeld (CA Bar No. 222187)
Virginia A. Sanderson (CA Bar No. 240241)
150 Post Street, Suite 520
San Francisco, CA 94108
Telephone: (415) 955-1155
Facsimile: (415) 955-1158
karl@KRInternetLaw.com
jeff@KRInternetLaw.com
ginny@KRInternetLaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
AMBER KRISTI MARSH AND STACIE EVANS
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
DENNIS A. WINSTON A PROFESSIONAL
LAW CORPORATION
Dennis A. Winston (CA Bar No. 068049)
3221 Carter Ave, Apt. 444
Marina Del Rey, California 90292
Telephone: (310) 306-4099
Facsimile: (310) 306-4499
denniswinston@yahoo.com
Attorneys for Defendants
ZAAZOOM SOLUTIONS, LLC; ZAZA PAY, LLC;
AUTOMATED ELECTRONIC CHECKING, INC.;
MULTIECOM, LLC; AND
ONLINE RESOURCE CENTER, LLC.
17
18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
19
20
22
AMBER KRISTI MARSH and
STACIE EVANS, individually and on
behalf of a class of similarly situated
persons,
23
Plaintiffs,
21
24
25
26
vs.
ZAAZOOM SOLUTIONS, LLC, et al.,
CLASS ACTION
Case No. 3:11-cv-05226-RS
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT
ENTERED AGAINST DEFENDANTS
MULTIECOM, LLC AND ONLINE
RESOURCE CENTER, LLC
[F.R.Civ.P. 55(c)]
Defendants.
27
28
Case No. 3:11-cv-05226-RS
STIPULATION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT;
[PROP.] ORDER
1
2
TO THE CLERK OF THE COURT AND TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR
ATTORNEYS OF RECORD HEREIN:
3
Plaintiffs AMBER KRISTI MARSH and STACIE EVANS (“Plaintiffs”) and
4
Defendants MULTIECOM, LLC and ONLINE RESOURCE CENTER, LLC (“Defendants”)
5
hereby STIPULATE as follows:
6
1.
On November 15, 2011, the Clerk of the Court entered default against
7
Defendants MultiECom, LLC and Online Resource Center, LLC [D.E. No. 26] (the
8
“Default”).
9
2.
The Default was the result of mistake, inadvertence and excusable neglect
10
on the part of counsel for Defendants which were first named as Defendants in the
11
Second Amended Complaint in the above-captioned action.
12
13
2.
Plaintiffs will not be prejudiced by setting aside the Default and the Default
was not the result of bad faith.
14
3.
Plaintiffs and Defendants therefore stipulate and request that the Court set
15
aside the Default pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(c).
16
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
17
18
DATED: November 18, 2011
DATED: November 18, 2011
KRONENBERGER ROSENFELD, LLP
DENNIS A. WINSTON A PROFESSIONAL
LAW CORPORATION
By:
By:
19
20
21
22
23
24
s/Jeffrey M. Rosenfeld
Jeffrey M. Rosenfeld
s/ Dennis A. Winston
Dennis A. Winston
Attorney for Defendants Zaazoom
Solutions, LLC; Zaza Pay LLC, Automated
Electronic Checking, Inc, Multiecom, LLC
and Online Resource Center, LLC
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
25
26
27
28
Case No. 3:11-cv-05226-RS
1
STIPULATION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT;
[PROP.] ORDER
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(c),
3
the defaults entered against Defendants Multiecom, LLC and Online Resource Center,
4
LLC, [D.E. No. 26], are hereby set aside.
5
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Multiecom, LLC and
6
Online Resource Center, LLC shall file a responsive pleading or motion within five (5)
7
days of this Order.
8
9
Dated: November 18 , 2011
10
____________________________________
THE HON. RICHARD SEEBORG
United States District Court Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE IN FILING
18
Pursuant to the General Order No. 45, section 45 X(B), for The United States
19
District Court for the Northern District of California, I, Jeffrey M. Rosenfeld, hereby attest
20
that the concurrence to the filing of the foregoing stipulation has been obtained from
21
Dennis A. Winston who has provided the conformed signature above.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 3:11-cv-05226-RS
2
STIPULATION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT;
[PROP.] ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?