Sandisk Corporation v. Round Rock Research LLC

Filing 103

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 101 DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 7/19/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/19/2012)

1
2
3

CHUCK P. EBERTIN (SBN 161374)
[e-mail]
VINSON & ELKINS LLP
525 University Avenue, Suite 410
Palo Alto, CA 94301-1918
Tel: [phone] / Fax: [phone]

DESMARAIS LLP
Jon T. Hohenthaner (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
John C. Spaccarotella (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Ameet A. Modi (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
230 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10169
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 212-351-3401

4
5
6
7
8

CHRISTOPHER V. RYAN (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
JANICE L. TA (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
VINSON & ELKINS LLP
The Terrace 7
2801 Via Fortuna, Suite 100
Austin, TX 78746
Tel: [phone] / Fax: [phone]

BLACK CHANG & HAMILL LLP
Bradford J. Black (SBN 252031)
[e-mail]
Andrew G. Hamill (SBN 251156)
[e-mail]
333 Bush Street, Suite 2250
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 4 15-813-6222

9
10
11
12
13
14

DAVID J. TOBIN (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
VINSON & ELKINS LLP
2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 3700
Dallas, TX 75201
Tel: [phone] / Fax [phone]

Attorneys for Defendant and
Counterclaim Plaintiff
ROUND ROCK RESEARCH LLC

Attorneys for Plaintiff and
Counterclaim Defendant
SANDISK CORPORATION

15
16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18
19

SANDISK CORPORATION,

20

Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant,

21
22

Case No. 11-cv-05243-RS

vs.

STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS

ROUND ROCK RESEARCH LLC,

23

Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff.

24
25

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), SanDisk Corporation

26

(“SanDisk”) and Round Rock Research LLP (“Round Rock”) hereby stipulate to dismiss the

27

following causes of action. SanDisk stipulates to dismiss its third cause of action (Declaratory

28

Judgment of Invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 6,900,528) and its eighth cause of action (Declaratory
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING
CERTAIN CLAIMS
1496948

1

Case No. 11-cv-05243-RS

1

Judgment of Non-Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,255,209) without prejudice. Round Rock

2

stipulates to dismiss the fifth count of its counterclaims (Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,255,209)

3

and its ninth count of its counterclaims (Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,900,528) with prejudice.

4
5

Dated: July 19, 2012

VINSON & ELKINS LLP

6
By:

7
8

/s/ Chuck P. Ebertin
Chuck P. Ebertin
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim
Defendant SANDISK CORPORATION

9
10
11

Dated: July 19, 2012

DESMARAIS LLP

12
By:

/s/ John C. Spaccarotella
John C. Spaccarotella (admitted pro hac vice)

13
14

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim
Plaintiff ROUND ROCK RESEARCH LLC

15
16

GENERAL ORDER 45, SECTION X.B.

17

I, Chuck P. Ebertin, hereby attest that John Spaccarotella has concurred in the filing of this

18
19

document.

20

By: /s/ Chuck P. Ebertin
Chuck P. Ebertin

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING
CERTAIN CLAIMS
1496948

2

Case No. 11-cv-05243-RS

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER

2

Pursuant to the above stipulation, SanDisk’s third cause of action (Declaratory Judgment of

3

Invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 6,900,528) and SanDisk’s eighth cause of action (Declaratory

4

Judgment of Non-Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,255,209) are hereby dismissed without

5

prejudice.

6

(Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,255,209) and Round Rock’s ninth count of its counterclaims

7

(Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,900,528) are hereby dismissed with prejudice.

Pursuant to the above stipulation, Round Rock’s fifth count of its counterclaims

8
9

IT IS SO ORDERED.

10
11

7/19/12
Dated: _______________________

_____________________________________
Honorable Richard Seeborg
United States District Judge

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING
CERTAIN CLAIMS
1496948

3

Case No. 11-cv-05243-RS