Sandisk Corporation v. Round Rock Research LLC

Filing 222

STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING ROUND ROCK PERMISSION TO FILE A CORRECTED AMENDED ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIMS TO SANDISK'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 8/26/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2013)

1 BLACK CHANG & HAMILL LLP
Bradford J. Black (SBN 252031)
2 [e-mail]
Andrew G. Hamill (SBN 251156)
3 [e-mail]
4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 1400
4 San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
5 Facsimile: 415-813-6222
6 DESMARAIS LLP
Jon T. Hohenthaner (admitted pro hac vice)
7 [e-mail]
John C. Spaccarotella (admitted pro hac vice)
8 [e-mail]
Ameet A. Modi (admitted pro hac vice)
9 [e-mail]
Richard M. Cowell (admitted pro hac vice)
10 [e-mail]
230 Park Avenue
11 New York, NY 10169
Telephone: [phone]
12 Facsimile: 212-351-3401
13 Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

15
16
17

SANDISK CORPORATION,

18

Plaintiff and
Counterclaim
Defendant,

19
20
21
22
23

Case No. 3:11-cv-05243-RS
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER GRANTING ROUND ROCK
PERMISSION TO FILE A
CORRECTED AMENDED ANSWER
AND COUNTERCLAIMS TO
SANDISK’S SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT

v.
ROUND ROCK RESEARCH LLC,
Defendant and
Counterclaim Plaintiff.

24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
ROUND ROCK PERMISSION TO FILE A CORRECTED
AMENDED ANSWER AND COUNTERLAIMS

1

Case No. 3:11-cv-05243-RS

DEFENDANT’S CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED ENTITIES

1

Defendant Round Rock Research LLC (“Round Rock”) and Plaintiff SanDisk Corporation

2 (“SanDisk”) hereby stipulate that the Court grant Round Rock permission to file a Corrected
3 Amended Answer and Counterclaims to SanDisk’s Second Amended Complaint. Round Rock’s
4 original Amended Answer and Counterclaims to SanDisk’s Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. No.
5 214) contains an administrative error that should be corrected in the official record. The parties
6 further stipulate that SanDisk be granted fourteen days from the filing of Round Rock's Corrected
7 Amended Answer and Counterclaims to SanDisk’s Second Amended Complaint to file its
8 responsive pleading.
9

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

10
11
12
13

Dated: August 23, 2013

14

BLACK CHANG & HAMILL LLP
By: /s/ Bradford J. Black
Bradford J. Black

15

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim
Plaintiff Round Rock Research LLC

16
17 Dated: August 23, 2013
18

VINSON & ELKINS LLP

19

By: /s/ Chuck P. Ebertin
Chuck P. Ebertin

20

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim
Defendant SanDisk Corp.

21
22

Civil L.R. 5-1(i)

23
24

I, Bradford J. Black, hereby attest that Chuck P. Ebertin has concurred in the filing of this

25 document.
By:

26
27
28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
ROUND ROCK PERMISSION TO FILE A CORRECTED
AMENDED ANSWER AND COUNTERLAIMS

2

/s/ Bradford J. Black
Bradford J. Black
Case No. 3:11-cv-05243-RS

DEFENDANT’S CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED ENTITIES

1
2
3

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED

4
5 Dated: __________________
8/26/13

__________________________
Honorable Richard Seeborg
United States District Judge

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
ROUND ROCK PERMISSION TO FILE A CORRECTED
AMENDED ANSWER AND COUNTERLAIMS

3

Case No. 3:11-cv-05243-RS

DEFENDANT’S CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED ENTITIES