Symantec Corporation v. Acronis, Inc

Filing 112

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 111 to Extend Deadline for the Parties to File Their Responsive and Reply Claim Construction Briefs filed by Symantec Corporation. Opposition due 10/9/12. Reply due 10/22/12. Tutorial Hearing set for 11/8/2012 02:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/20/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/20/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 SYMANTEC CORPORATION, Case No. 3:11-cv-05310 EMC 13 Defendant, 14 Plaintiff and Counterclaim vs. 15 ACRONIS, INC. and ACRONIS INTERNATIONAL GMBH, 16 Defendants and 17 Counterclaimants. Honorable: Edward M. Chen [PROPOSED] ORDER RE STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR THE PARTIES TO FILE THEIR RESPONSIVE AND REPLY CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEFS (Tutorial set for 11/8/12 at 2:30 p.m.) 18 19 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED; 20 The deadline for the parties to file their responsive claim construction briefs shall be 21 extended from October 1, 2012 to October 9, 2012 and the deadline for the parties to file their RT R NIA dward Judge E n M. Che FO NO 28 LI 27 DERED SO OR ED IT IS DIFI AS MO H Case No. 3:11-cv-05310 EMC ER [PROPOSED] ORDER RE STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE C DEADLINE FOR THE PARTIES TO FILE THEIR RESPONSIVE AND REPLY CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEFS N F A 26 UNIT ED S RT U O 22 reply claim construction briefs shall be extended from October 15, 2012 to October 22, 2012. 23 Tutorial is set for November 8, 2012 at 2:30 p.m. S DISTRICT DATED: September __, 2012 20 TE C By: 24 TA Hon. Edward M. Chen 25 United States District Judge D IS T IC T O R

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?