Symantec Corporation v. Acronis, Inc
Filing
112
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 111 to Extend Deadline for the Parties to File Their Responsive and Reply Claim Construction Briefs filed by Symantec Corporation. Opposition due 10/9/12. Reply due 10/22/12. Tutorial Hearing set for 11/8/2012 02:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/20/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/20/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
SYMANTEC CORPORATION,
Case No. 3:11-cv-05310 EMC
13 Defendant,
14
Plaintiff and Counterclaim
vs.
15 ACRONIS, INC. and ACRONIS
INTERNATIONAL GMBH,
16
Defendants and
17 Counterclaimants.
Honorable: Edward M. Chen
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE
STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE
DEADLINE FOR THE PARTIES TO
FILE THEIR RESPONSIVE AND
REPLY CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
BRIEFS
(Tutorial set for 11/8/12 at 2:30 p.m.)
18
19
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED;
20
The deadline for the parties to file their responsive claim construction briefs shall be
21 extended from October 1, 2012 to October 9, 2012 and the deadline for the parties to file their
RT
R NIA
dward
Judge E
n
M. Che
FO
NO
28
LI
27
DERED
SO OR ED
IT IS
DIFI
AS MO
H
Case No. 3:11-cv-05310 EMC
ER
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE
C
DEADLINE FOR THE PARTIES TO FILE THEIR RESPONSIVE AND REPLY CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEFS
N
F
A
26
UNIT
ED
S
RT
U
O
22 reply claim construction briefs shall be extended from October 15, 2012 to October 22, 2012.
23 Tutorial is set for November 8, 2012 at 2:30 p.m.
S DISTRICT
DATED: September __, 2012
20
TE
C
By:
24
TA
Hon. Edward M. Chen
25
United States District Judge
D IS T IC T O
R
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?