Symantec Corporation v. Acronis, Inc

Filing 126

ORDER re Number of Terms to Be Construed. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/19/2012. (emclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 SYMANTEC CORPORATION, 9 Plaintiff, 10 v. 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court No. C-11-5310 EMC ACRONIS, INC., et al., 12 ORDER RE NUMBER OF TERMS TO BE CONSTRUED Defendants. ___________________________________/ 13 14 15 Previously, the Court informed the parties that, as an initial matter, it was not inclined to 16 construe any more than twenty terms total, possibly fewer. The Court also informed the parties that 17 they should meet and confer to determine which twenty terms they consider to be most significant. 18 For those twenty terms, the Court now instructs the parties to provide additional information. 19 More specifically, for each term, the parties should provide: 20 (1) A statement as to why the term needs to be construed (i.e., why it is significant); and 21 (2) A statement as to how the term relates to claims or defenses that will be presented at trial or 22 in relation to a dispositive motion. 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 2 The information requested above should be provided in a joint chart format and filed no later than October 29, 2012. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: October 19, 2012 7 _________________________ EDWARD M. CHEN United States District Judge 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?