Symantec Corporation v. Acronis, Inc
Filing
126
ORDER re Number of Terms to Be Construed. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/19/2012. (emclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
SYMANTEC CORPORATION,
9
Plaintiff,
10
v.
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
No. C-11-5310 EMC
ACRONIS, INC., et al.,
12
ORDER RE NUMBER OF TERMS TO
BE CONSTRUED
Defendants.
___________________________________/
13
14
15
Previously, the Court informed the parties that, as an initial matter, it was not inclined to
16
construe any more than twenty terms total, possibly fewer. The Court also informed the parties that
17
they should meet and confer to determine which twenty terms they consider to be most significant.
18
For those twenty terms, the Court now instructs the parties to provide additional information.
19
More specifically, for each term, the parties should provide:
20
(1)
A statement as to why the term needs to be construed (i.e., why it is significant); and
21
(2)
A statement as to how the term relates to claims or defenses that will be presented at trial or
22
in relation to a dispositive motion.
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
2
The information requested above should be provided in a joint chart format and filed no later
than October 29, 2012.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated: October 19, 2012
7
_________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?