Symantec Corporation v. Acronis, Inc
Filing
20
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER re 19 Stipulation filed by Symantec Corporation. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/28/11. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Jennifer A. Kash (Bar No. 203679)
jenniferkash@quinnemanuel.com
Eric E. Wall (Bar No. 248692)
ericwall@quinnemanuel.com
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 875-6600
Facsimile: (415) 875-6700
David A. Nelson
davenelson@quinnemanuel.com
Amanda S. Williamson
amandawilliamson@quinnemanuel.com
Robert R. Cleary, Jr.
robertcleary@quinnemanuel.com
Aaron Perez-Daple
aaronperezdaple@quinnemanuel.com
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
500 West Madison Street, Suite 2450
Chicago, IL 60661
Telephone: (312) 705-7400
Facsimile: (312) 705-7401
Attorneys for Symantec Corporation
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
15
16
17
18
SYMANTEC CORPORATION,
Case No. 3:11-cv-05310 EMC
19
20
21
Plaintiff,
v.
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF
TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO
COMPLAINT FOR PATENT
INFRINGEMENT ; ORDER
ACRONIS, INC.,
22
Defendant.
23
24
25
26
27
28
03869.30068/4459823.1
Case No. 3:11-cv-05310-EMC
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE
RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT
1
2
3
4
5
6
WHEREAS, on November 3, 2011, Plaintiff Symantec Corporation (“Symantec”) served
a Complaint of Patent Infringement on Defendant Acronis, Inc. (“Acronis”);
WHEREAS Acronis has now requested, and Symantec does not oppose, an extension of
time for Acronis to respond to Symantec’s Complaint for Patent Infringement;
THEREFORE Symantec HEREBY STIPULATES AND AGREES that: Acronis shall
have until December 23, 2011 to respond to Symantec’s Complaint for patent Infringement.
7
8
9
Dated: November 22, 2011
Respectfully submitted,
10
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
11
/s/
12
Jennifer A. Kash (Bar No. 203679)
13
Attorneys for Plaintiff Symantec Corp.
14
15
IT IS SO ORDERED:
ER
H
23
24
R NIA
FO
RT
22
. Chen
dward M
Judge E
NO
21
_________________
ED
Edward M. Chen SO ORDER
IS
I Judge
U.S. DistrictT
LI
20
UNIT
ED
19
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
18
S
17
A
16
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
25
26
27
28
03869.30068/4459823.1
Case No. 3:11-cv-05310-EMC
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE
RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?