Symantec Corporation v. Acronis, Inc

Filing 20

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER re 19 Stipulation filed by Symantec Corporation. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/28/11. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Jennifer A. Kash (Bar No. 203679) jenniferkash@quinnemanuel.com Eric E. Wall (Bar No. 248692) ericwall@quinnemanuel.com QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 50 California Street, 22nd Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 875-6600 Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 David A. Nelson davenelson@quinnemanuel.com Amanda S. Williamson amandawilliamson@quinnemanuel.com Robert R. Cleary, Jr. robertcleary@quinnemanuel.com Aaron Perez-Daple aaronperezdaple@quinnemanuel.com QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 500 West Madison Street, Suite 2450 Chicago, IL 60661 Telephone: (312) 705-7400 Facsimile: (312) 705-7401 Attorneys for Symantec Corporation 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 15 16 17 18 SYMANTEC CORPORATION, Case No. 3:11-cv-05310 EMC 19 20 21 Plaintiff, v. STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT ; ORDER ACRONIS, INC., 22 Defendant. 23 24 25 26 27 28 03869.30068/4459823.1 Case No. 3:11-cv-05310-EMC STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT 1 2 3 4 5 6 WHEREAS, on November 3, 2011, Plaintiff Symantec Corporation (“Symantec”) served a Complaint of Patent Infringement on Defendant Acronis, Inc. (“Acronis”); WHEREAS Acronis has now requested, and Symantec does not oppose, an extension of time for Acronis to respond to Symantec’s Complaint for Patent Infringement; THEREFORE Symantec HEREBY STIPULATES AND AGREES that: Acronis shall have until December 23, 2011 to respond to Symantec’s Complaint for patent Infringement. 7 8 9 Dated: November 22, 2011 Respectfully submitted, 10 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 11 /s/ 12 Jennifer A. Kash (Bar No. 203679) 13 Attorneys for Plaintiff Symantec Corp. 14 15 IT IS SO ORDERED: ER H 23 24 R NIA FO RT 22 . Chen dward M Judge E NO 21 _________________ ED Edward M. Chen SO ORDER IS I Judge U.S. DistrictT LI 20 UNIT ED 19 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 18 S 17 A 16 N F D IS T IC T O R C 25 26 27 28 03869.30068/4459823.1 Case No. 3:11-cv-05310-EMC STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?