Symantec Corporation v. Acronis, Inc

Filing 48

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 44 Order selecting Private ADR by Symantec Corporation filed by Symantec Corporation, ORDER REFERRING CASE to Private ADR. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/7/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/7/2012)

1 Jennifer A. Kash (Bar No. 203679)
[e-mail]
2 Eric E. Wall (Bar No. 248692)
[e-mail]
3 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
4 San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
5 Facsimile: [phone]
6 John W. Thornburgh (SBN 154627/[e-mail])
Jason W. Wolff (SBN 215819/[e-mail])
7 Olga I. May (SBN 232012/[e-mail])
Alex Gelberg (SBN 279989/[e-mail])
8 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
12390 El Camino Real
9 San Diego, California 92130
Telephone: [phone]
10 Facsimile: [phone]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12

13 SYMANTEC CORPORATION,
14
15

Case No. 3:11-cv-05310 EMC

Plaintiff,
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
SELECTING ADR PROCESS

vs.

16 ACRONIS, INC.,
17

Defendant.

18
19

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the

20 following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
21 The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
22

Court Processes:

23

Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)

24

Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)

25

Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

26
27

Private Process:
Private ADR. The parties elect to mediate this case through JAMS

28
Case No. 3:11-cv-05310 EMC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

1

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:

2

the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order

3

referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )

4

within two weeks of the Court’s claim construction order.

5

Dated: February 3, 2012

6
7
8
9
10

/s/ Jennifer Kash
Jennifer Kash
Attorney for Plaintiff Symantec Corporation

Dated: February 3, 2012
/s/ Jerry T. Yen
Jerry T. Yen
Attorney for Defendant Acronis

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 3:11-cv-05310 EMC
-2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

1
2

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
Pursuant to General Order No. 45(X)(B), I hereby certify that concurrence in the filing of

3 this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories shown above.
4

_/s/__Kate E. Cassidy____________

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 3:11-cv-05310 EMC
-3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

2
3 SYMANTEC CORPORATION,
Case No. 3:11-cv-05310 EMC
4
5

Plaintiff,
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
SELECTING ADR PROCESS

vs.

6 ACRONIS, INC.,
7

Defendant.

8
9

[PROPOSED] ORDER

10

Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to:

11

Non-binding Arbitration

12

Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE)

13

Mediation

14

Private ADR

15
16

Deadline for ADR session

17

90 days from the date of this order.

18

within two weeks of the Court’s claim construction order.

19
IT IS SO ORDERED.

RT

26

ard M.

dw
Judge E

ER

28

Chen

A

H

27

R NIA

IT IS S

NO

25

D

ERE
UNITED STATES JUDGE
O ORD

FO

24

2/7/12

UNIT
ED

23

Dated:

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

22

S

21

LI

20

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

Case No. 3:11-cv-05310 EMC
-4STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS