Symantec Corporation v. Acronis, Inc
Filing
73
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE SYMANTEC'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT ADDING ACRONIS INTERNATIONAL AS DEFENDANT AND CONSOLIDATING PATENTS-IN-SUIT IN TO ONE COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/9/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11 SYMANTEC CORPORATION,
12
13
14
Plaintiff and Counterclaim
Defendant,
Honorable: Edward M. Chen
vs.
ACRONIS, INC. and ACRONIS
15 INTERNATIONAL GMBH,
16
17
Case No. 3:11-cv-05310 EMC (consolidated for
all purposes with Case No. CV12-01062 PSG)
Defendants and
Counterclaimants.
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
SYMANTEC’S SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT ADDING ACRONIS
INTERNATIONAL GMBH AS DEFENDANT
AND CONSOLIDATING PATENTS-IN-SUIT
INTO ONE COMPLAINT
18
19
20
21
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1.
Symantec’s Second Amended Complaint is to be filed adding Acronis International
22
R NIA
. Chen
ward M
e EdCase No. 3:11-cv-05310 EMC
Judg
RT
FO
NO
28
IT
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SYMANTEC’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT ADDING ACRONIS
INTERNATIONAL GMBH AS DEFENDANT AND CONSOLIDATING PATENTS-IN-SUIT
H
ER
LI
27
Hon. Edward M. Chen ERED
RD
United States District Judge
IS SO O
A
26
By:
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
25
9
DATED: May __, 2012
S
24
GmbH as a defendant and incorporating all five of Symantec’s patents-in-suit..
UNIT
ED
23
N
F
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?