Symantec Corporation v. Acronis, Inc

Filing 73

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE SYMANTEC'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT ADDING ACRONIS INTERNATIONAL AS DEFENDANT AND CONSOLIDATING PATENTS-IN-SUIT IN TO ONE COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/9/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 SYMANTEC CORPORATION, 12 13 14 Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant, Honorable: Edward M. Chen vs. ACRONIS, INC. and ACRONIS 15 INTERNATIONAL GMBH, 16 17 Case No. 3:11-cv-05310 EMC (consolidated for all purposes with Case No. CV12-01062 PSG) Defendants and Counterclaimants. [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SYMANTEC’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT ADDING ACRONIS INTERNATIONAL GMBH AS DEFENDANT AND CONSOLIDATING PATENTS-IN-SUIT INTO ONE COMPLAINT 18 19 20 21 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Symantec’s Second Amended Complaint is to be filed adding Acronis International 22 R NIA . Chen ward M e EdCase No. 3:11-cv-05310 EMC Judg RT FO NO 28 IT [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SYMANTEC’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT ADDING ACRONIS INTERNATIONAL GMBH AS DEFENDANT AND CONSOLIDATING PATENTS-IN-SUIT H ER LI 27 Hon. Edward M. Chen ERED RD United States District Judge IS SO O A 26 By: S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 25 9 DATED: May __, 2012 S 24 GmbH as a defendant and incorporating all five of Symantec’s patents-in-suit.. UNIT ED 23 N F C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?