Symantec Corporation v. Acronis, Inc
Filing
81
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 80 extending Symantec's time to respond to Acronis's Answer and Counterclaims filed by Symantec Corporation. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/7/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/7/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11 SYMANTEC CORPORATION,
12
13
14
Plaintiff and Counterclaim
Defendant,
Honorable: Edward M. Chen
vs.
ACRONIS, INC. and ACRONIS
15 INTERNATIONAL GMBH,
16
17
Case No. 3:11-cv-05310 EMC (consolidated for
all purposes with Case No. CV12-01062 PSG)
Defendants and
Counterclaimants.
STIPULATION TO EXTEND
SYMANTEC’S TIME TO FILE A
RESPONSE TO ACRONIS’S
AMENDED ANSWER AND
COUNTERCLAIMS
18
19
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
20
Symantec’s time to respond to Acronis’s May 23, 2012 pleading shall be extended
R NIA
en
d M. Ch
dwar
Judge E
ER
H
28
RT
27
ERED
O ORD
Hon. Edward M. Chen
IT IS S
United States District Judge
NO
26
By:
FO
25
UNIT
ED
24
7
DATED: June __, 2012
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
23
S
22 to June 13, 2012.
LI
1.
A
21
N
D IS
F
C
Case T O
No. 3:11-cv-05310 EMC
T TIME
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION TO EXTEND SYMANTEC’SR I C TO FILE A RESPONSE
TO ACRONIS’S AMENDED ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?