Symantec Corporation v. Acronis, Inc

Filing 81

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 80 extending Symantec's time to respond to Acronis's Answer and Counterclaims filed by Symantec Corporation. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/7/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/7/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 SYMANTEC CORPORATION, 12 13 14 Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant, Honorable: Edward M. Chen vs. ACRONIS, INC. and ACRONIS 15 INTERNATIONAL GMBH, 16 17 Case No. 3:11-cv-05310 EMC (consolidated for all purposes with Case No. CV12-01062 PSG) Defendants and Counterclaimants. STIPULATION TO EXTEND SYMANTEC’S TIME TO FILE A RESPONSE TO ACRONIS’S AMENDED ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIMS 18 19 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 20 Symantec’s time to respond to Acronis’s May 23, 2012 pleading shall be extended R NIA en d M. Ch dwar Judge E ER H 28 RT 27 ERED O ORD Hon. Edward M. Chen IT IS S United States District Judge NO 26 By: FO 25 UNIT ED 24 7 DATED: June __, 2012 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 23 S 22 to June 13, 2012. LI 1. A 21 N D IS F C Case T O No. 3:11-cv-05310 EMC T TIME [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION TO EXTEND SYMANTEC’SR I C TO FILE A RESPONSE TO ACRONIS’S AMENDED ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?