Craig v. United States of America et al
Filing
10
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 9 Stipulation to Dismiss with Prejudice Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) filed by Rosemary Langley Melville, Alejandro Mayorkas, Janet Napolitano, United States of America, Eric H. Holder. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D Laporte on 1/30/2012. (kns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
TONY WEST
United States Department of Justice
Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division
JEFFREY S. ROBINS
Assistant Director, District Court Section
SHEREASE PRATT NYSB 2620912
Trial Attorney
United States Department of Justice
Civil Division
Office of Immigration Litigation
District Court Section
P.O. Box 868, Ben Franklin Station
Washington, DC 20530
Phone: (202) 616-0063
Facsimile: (202) 616-8962
Attorneys for Defendants
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
)
et al.,
)
Defendants. )
)
)
ROSSANA CRAIG,
No. 3:11-CV-05315-EDL
PARTIES’ STIPULATION TO
DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P.
41(a)(1)(A)(ii); AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER
In accordance with the provisions of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii),
Plaintiff, by and through her attorney of record, Rhoda Wilkinson Domingo, and Defendants,
by and through their attorney of record, Sherease Pratt, hereby stipulate to dismissal of the
above-entitled action, with prejudice. The action seeks to compel adjudication of Ms. Craig’s
Form I-687, Application for Status as a Temporary Resident. United States Citizenship and
Immigration Services (“USCIS”) approved Ms. Craig’s I-687 on June 21, 2010. Because the
Stipulation to Dismiss
3:11-cv-05315-EDL
1
complaint is moot, the parties have agreed to dismiss this case, with prejudice. Plaintiff will
2
not seek attorney’s fees or costs under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, or
3
any other provision of law, associated with the above-captioned matter. Each of the parties
4
shall bear their own costs and fees.
5
6
7
8
DATED: January 30, 2012
DATED: January 30, 2012
/s/ Rhoda Wilkinson Domingo
RHODA WILKINSON DOMINGO, Esq.
TONY WEST
Assistant Attorney General
United States Department of Justice
11
Rhoda Wilkinson Domingo
Law Office of Rhoda Wilkinson Domingo
414 Jackson Street, Suite 202
San Francisco, CA 94111
Phone: (415) 986-1121
Email: rhoda@lawrwd.com
12
Attorney for Plaintiff
9
10
JEFFREY S. ROBINS
Assistant Director
District Court Section
/s/ Sherease Pratt
SHEREASE PRATT1
Trial Attorney
United States Department of Justice
Civil Division
Office of Immigration Litigation
District Court Section
P.O. Box 868, Ben Franklin Station
Washington, DC 20530
Phone: (202) 616-0063
Facsimile: (202) 616-8962
Email: Sherease.Pratt@usdoj.gov
13
14
15
16
17
Attorneys for Defendants
18
19
20
ORDER
21
Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
23
Date: January 30, 2012
___________________________
ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE
United States Magistrate Judge
24
25
26
27
1
I, Sherease Pratt, hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures
indicated by a “conformed” signature (/S/) within this e-filed document.
28
Stipulation to Dismiss
3:11-cv-05315-EDL
2
1
2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Case No. 3:11-cv-05315-EDL
3
I hereby certify that on January 30, 2012, one copy of the foregoingStipulation to
4
Dismiss was served on counsel for Plaintiff via the district court ECF system which will send
5
notification of such filing to the following ECF filer:
6
9
Rhoda Wilkinson Domingo
Law Office of Rhoda Wilkinson Domingo
414 Jackson Street, Suite 202
San Francisco, CA 94111
Email: rhoda@lawrwd.com
10
Attorney for Plaintiff
7
8
11
/s/ Sherease Pratt
SHEREASE PRATT
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation to Dismiss
3:11-cv-05315-EDL
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?