Craig v. United States of America et al

Filing 10

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 9 Stipulation to Dismiss with Prejudice Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) filed by Rosemary Langley Melville, Alejandro Mayorkas, Janet Napolitano, United States of America, Eric H. Holder. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D Laporte on 1/30/2012. (kns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 TONY WEST United States Department of Justice Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division JEFFREY S. ROBINS Assistant Director, District Court Section SHEREASE PRATT NYSB 2620912 Trial Attorney United States Department of Justice Civil Division Office of Immigration Litigation District Court Section P.O. Box 868, Ben Franklin Station Washington, DC 20530 Phone: (202) 616-0063 Facsimile: (202) 616-8962 Attorneys for Defendants UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) et al., ) Defendants. ) ) ) ROSSANA CRAIG, No. 3:11-CV-05315-EDL PARTIES’ STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); AND [PROPOSED] ORDER In accordance with the provisions of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff, by and through her attorney of record, Rhoda Wilkinson Domingo, and Defendants, by and through their attorney of record, Sherease Pratt, hereby stipulate to dismissal of the above-entitled action, with prejudice. The action seeks to compel adjudication of Ms. Craig’s Form I-687, Application for Status as a Temporary Resident. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) approved Ms. Craig’s I-687 on June 21, 2010. Because the Stipulation to Dismiss 3:11-cv-05315-EDL 1 complaint is moot, the parties have agreed to dismiss this case, with prejudice. Plaintiff will 2 not seek attorney’s fees or costs under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, or 3 any other provision of law, associated with the above-captioned matter. Each of the parties 4 shall bear their own costs and fees. 5 6 7 8 DATED: January 30, 2012 DATED: January 30, 2012 /s/ Rhoda Wilkinson Domingo RHODA WILKINSON DOMINGO, Esq. TONY WEST Assistant Attorney General United States Department of Justice 11 Rhoda Wilkinson Domingo Law Office of Rhoda Wilkinson Domingo 414 Jackson Street, Suite 202 San Francisco, CA 94111 Phone: (415) 986-1121 Email: rhoda@lawrwd.com 12 Attorney for Plaintiff 9 10 JEFFREY S. ROBINS Assistant Director District Court Section /s/ Sherease Pratt SHEREASE PRATT1 Trial Attorney United States Department of Justice Civil Division Office of Immigration Litigation District Court Section P.O. Box 868, Ben Franklin Station Washington, DC 20530 Phone: (202) 616-0063 Facsimile: (202) 616-8962 Email: Sherease.Pratt@usdoj.gov 13 14 15 16 17 Attorneys for Defendants 18 19 20 ORDER 21 Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 Date: January 30, 2012 ___________________________ ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE United States Magistrate Judge 24 25 26 27 1 I, Sherease Pratt, hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a “conformed” signature (/S/) within this e-filed document. 28 Stipulation to Dismiss 3:11-cv-05315-EDL 2 1 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Case No. 3:11-cv-05315-EDL 3 I hereby certify that on January 30, 2012, one copy of the foregoingStipulation to 4 Dismiss was served on counsel for Plaintiff via the district court ECF system which will send 5 notification of such filing to the following ECF filer: 6 9 Rhoda Wilkinson Domingo Law Office of Rhoda Wilkinson Domingo 414 Jackson Street, Suite 202 San Francisco, CA 94111 Email: rhoda@lawrwd.com 10 Attorney for Plaintiff 7 8 11 /s/ Sherease Pratt SHEREASE PRATT 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation to Dismiss 3:11-cv-05315-EDL 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?