Ridenhour v. UMG Recordings, Inc.

Filing 14

ORDER Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/10/2012 02:30 PM. (AS AMENDED) CONTINUING MOTION TO 2/10/12 @ 9 A.M.(tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2012)

Download PDF
1 5 JEFFREY D. GOLDMAN (Bar No. 155589), JGoldman@jmbm.com RYAN S. MAUCK (Bar No. 223173), RMauck@jmbm.com BRIAN M. YATES (Bar No. 241798), BYates@jmbm.com JEFFER MANGELS BUTLER & MITCHELL LLP 1900 Avenue of the Stars, Seventh Floor Los Angeles, California 90067-4308 Telephone: (310) 203-8080 Facsimile: (310) 203-0567 6 Attorneys for Defendant UMG RECORDINGS, INC. 2 3 4 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 10 11 12 13 CARLTON DOUGLAS RIDENHOUR, d/b/a "CHUCK D", INDIVIDUALLY AND AS A MEMBER OF "PUBLIC ENEMY", ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, Plaintiff, 14 v. 15 16 CASE NO. 11-CV-05321-SI [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO ADVANCE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE DATE AND HEARING DATE ON DEFENDANT UMG RECORDINGS, INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS UMG RECORDINGS, INC., a Delaware corporation, 17 Defendant. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER 8488504v1 -1- [Proposed] Order 1 Pursuant to the stipulation between plaintiff Carlton Douglas Ridenhour, d/b/a “Chuck D”, 2 individually and as a member of “Public Enemy” (“Plaintiff”) and defendant UMG Recordings, Inc. 3 (“UMGR”), and good cause appearing therefor, the Court orders as follows: 4 5 6 7 1. The Case Management Conference and the hearing on UMGR’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Third Cause of Action for open book account are set for February 10, 2012, at 2:30 p.m. 9:00 a.m., respectively. IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 10 Date: ________________, 2012 1/12 11 ______________________________________ HON. SUSAN ILLSTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER 8488504v1 -2- [Proposed] Order

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?