Ridenhour v. UMG Recordings, Inc.
Filing
14
ORDER Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/10/2012 02:30 PM. (AS AMENDED) CONTINUING MOTION TO 2/10/12 @ 9 A.M.(tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2012)
1
5
JEFFREY D. GOLDMAN (Bar No. 155589),
JGoldman@jmbm.com
RYAN S. MAUCK (Bar No. 223173), RMauck@jmbm.com
BRIAN M. YATES (Bar No. 241798), BYates@jmbm.com
JEFFER MANGELS BUTLER & MITCHELL LLP
1900 Avenue of the Stars, Seventh Floor
Los Angeles, California 90067-4308
Telephone:
(310) 203-8080
Facsimile:
(310) 203-0567
6
Attorneys for Defendant UMG RECORDINGS, INC.
2
3
4
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
10
11
12
13
CARLTON DOUGLAS RIDENHOUR, d/b/a
"CHUCK D", INDIVIDUALLY AND AS A
MEMBER OF "PUBLIC ENEMY", ON
BEHALF OF HIMSELF AND ALL OTHERS
SIMILARLY SITUATED,
Plaintiff,
14
v.
15
16
CASE NO.
11-CV-05321-SI
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATION TO ADVANCE CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE DATE
AND HEARING DATE ON DEFENDANT
UMG RECORDINGS, INC.’S MOTION TO
DISMISS
UMG RECORDINGS, INC., a Delaware
corporation,
17
Defendant.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PRINTED ON
RECYCLED PAPER
8488504v1
-1-
[Proposed] Order
1
Pursuant to the stipulation between plaintiff Carlton Douglas Ridenhour, d/b/a “Chuck D”,
2
individually and as a member of “Public Enemy” (“Plaintiff”) and defendant UMG Recordings, Inc.
3
(“UMGR”), and good cause appearing therefor, the Court orders as follows:
4
5
6
7
1.
The Case Management Conference and the hearing on UMGR’s Motion to Dismiss
Plaintiff’s Third Cause of Action for open book account are set for February 10, 2012, at 2:30 p.m.
9:00 a.m., respectively.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
10
Date: ________________, 2012
1/12
11
______________________________________
HON. SUSAN ILLSTON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PRINTED ON
RECYCLED PAPER
8488504v1
-2-
[Proposed] Order
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?