Salhuana v. Diamond Foods, Inc. et al
Filing
18
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASES SHOULD NOT BE CONSOLIDATED. Signed by Judge Alsup on January 3, 2012. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
JORGE SALHUANA, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
12
13
No. C 11-05386 WHA
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
WHY CASES SHOULD NOT
BE CONSOLIDATED
v.
14
DIAMOND FOODS, INC, MICHAEL J.
MENDES, and STEVEN M. NEIL,
15
Defendants.
/
16
17
AND RELATED ACTIONS
/
18
19
20
Pursuant to the Court’s order dated December 21, 2011, the following cases are related
under Civil Local Rule 3-12:
21
C 11-05386
Salhuana v. Diamond Foods, Inc., et al.
22
C 11-05399
Mitchem v. Diamond Foods, Inc., et al.
23
C 11-05409
Woodward v. Diamond Foods, Inc., et al.
24
C 11-05457
Rall, et al. v. Diamond Foods, Inc., et al.
25
C 11-05479
Simon v. Diamond Foods, Inc., et al.
26
C 11-05615
MacFarland v. Diamond Foods, Inc., et al.
27
Any party objecting to the consolidation of these cases pursuant to Rule 42(a) of the
28
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure must show cause in writing no later than January 9, 2012, why
the cases should not be consolidated, together with all cases related to them in the future. Any
1
response to such objections must be filed no later than January 17, at which time the matter will
2
be deemed submitted.
3
The Court is aware that there is a related derivative action. That action will maintain its
4
related status, but the Court does not propose consolidating that action with the above-stated
5
actions.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
Dated: January 3, 2012.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?