Salhuana v. Diamond Foods, Inc. et al

Filing 18

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASES SHOULD NOT BE CONSOLIDATED. Signed by Judge Alsup on January 3, 2012. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

JORGE SALHUANA, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,

12
13

No. C 11-05386 WHA

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
WHY CASES SHOULD NOT
BE CONSOLIDATED

v.

14

DIAMOND FOODS, INC, MICHAEL J.
MENDES, and STEVEN M. NEIL,

15

Defendants.
/

16
17

AND RELATED ACTIONS
/

18
19
20

Pursuant to the Court’s order dated December 21, 2011, the following cases are related
under Civil Local Rule 3-12:

21

C 11-05386

Salhuana v. Diamond Foods, Inc., et al.

22

C 11-05399

Mitchem v. Diamond Foods, Inc., et al.

23

C 11-05409

Woodward v. Diamond Foods, Inc., et al.

24

C 11-05457

Rall, et al. v. Diamond Foods, Inc., et al.

25

C 11-05479

Simon v. Diamond Foods, Inc., et al.

26

C 11-05615

MacFarland v. Diamond Foods, Inc., et al.

27

Any party objecting to the consolidation of these cases pursuant to Rule 42(a) of the

28

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure must show cause in writing no later than January 9, 2012, why
the cases should not be consolidated, together with all cases related to them in the future. Any

1

response to such objections must be filed no later than January 17, at which time the matter will

2

be deemed submitted.

3

The Court is aware that there is a related derivative action. That action will maintain its

4

related status, but the Court does not propose consolidating that action with the above-stated

5

actions.

6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.

8
9

Dated: January 3, 2012.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2